Plaintiff did not state any viable tort claims against defendant who referred to plaintiff by derogatory names at a public meeting regarding a zoning matter.
May 05, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Defamation • Invasion of Privacy • Emotional Distress • Tortious Interference
Selig v. Roth, PICS Case No. 17-0531 (C.P. Lehigh Jul. 18, 2016) Reichley, J. (18 pages).
Plaintiff did not state any viable tort claims against defendant who referred to plaintiff by derogatory names at a public meeting regarding a zoning matter.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
