Where the parties entered into a written lease agreement, defendants were barred by the parol evidence rule from offering into evidence purported statements that contradicted the terms of the lease agreement. The court found in favor of plaintiff and granted her possession of the property.
May 12, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Parol Evidence Rule • Written Lease • Fraud in Inducement
Hollins v. Velasquez, PICS Case No. 17-0625 (C.P. Monroe March 6, 2017) Higgins, J. (17 pages).
Where the parties entered into a written lease agreement, defendants were barred by the parol evidence rule from offering into evidence purported statements that contradicted the terms of the lease agreement. The court found in favor of plaintiff and granted her possession of the property.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
