Appellant's interrogation by officers did not constitute an illegal arrest or taint appellant's subsequent confession and arrest requiring suppression. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
May 12, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Capital First-Degree Murder • Motion to Suppress Statements to Police • Waiver of ‘Miranda’ Rights • Presentation of False Evidence/’Brady’ Violation
Commonwealth v. Yandamuri, PICS Case No. 17-0696 (Pa. April 26, 2017) Baer, J. (42 pages).
Appellant’s interrogation by officers did not constitute an illegal arrest or taint appellant’s subsequent confession and arrest requiring suppression. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
