Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether defendants had constructive notice of a dangerous condition at a shopping mall such that it could have been discovered and corrected through the exercise of reasonable care.
May 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Negligence • Duty • Constructive Notice • Reasonable Care
Brown v. Stroud Mall, LLC, PICS Case No. 17-0722 (C.P. Monroe Aug. 23, 2016) Sibum, J. (12 pages).
Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether defendants had constructive notice of a dangerous condition at a shopping mall such that it could have been discovered and corrected through the exercise of reasonable care.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C., a highly-regarded corporate restructuring, bankruptcy and commercial litigation boutique, seeks an attorney to ...
General Counsel Posting Number: 1925 Closing Date: Location: Oakland, CA (Hybrid) The Public Health Institute (PHI) is an in...
We are seeking an associate to join our Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights practice in either Hartford or Stamford. Candidates should have a...
