Defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in pretrial home confinement with electronic monitoring, because such time did not qualify as being "in custody" for purposes of sentence credit. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
May 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Sentencing • Credit for Pretrial Home Confinement • “In Custody”
Commonwealth v. Dixon, PICS Case No. 17-0740 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2017) Stevens, J. (7 pages).
Defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in pretrial home confinement with electronic monitoring, because such time did not qualify as being “in custody” for purposes of sentence credit. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
