Defendant improperly sought to collaterally attack the legality of his confinement sentence on appeal from a final decision of the Office of Open Records, as the Post-Conviction Relief Act was defendant's exclusive state law remedy. The court affirmed a final decision of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
May 26, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Sentencing • Collateral Attack • Right-to-Know Law
Claritt v. Dept. of Corrections, PICS Case No. 17-0793 (Pa. Commw. May 8, 2017) McCullough, J. (4 pages).
Defendant improperly sought to collaterally attack the legality of his confinement sentence on appeal from a final decision of the Office of Open Records, as the Post-Conviction Relief Act was defendant’s exclusive state law remedy. The court affirmed a final decision of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
