Defendant improperly sought to collaterally attack the legality of his confinement sentence on appeal from a final decision of the Office of Open Records, as the Post-Conviction Relief Act was defendant's exclusive state law remedy. The court affirmed a final decision of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
May 26, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Sentencing • Collateral Attack • Right-to-Know Law
Claritt v. Dept. of Corrections, PICS Case No. 17-0793 (Pa. Commw. May 8, 2017) McCullough, J. (4 pages).
Defendant improperly sought to collaterally attack the legality of his confinement sentence on appeal from a final decision of the Office of Open Records, as the Post-Conviction Relief Act was defendant’s exclusive state law remedy. The court affirmed a final decision of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong TEAM that operates with the highest standards of independ...
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong team that operates with the highest standards of independ...
CAREER OPPORTUNITYUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT - USDC-CT 24-14 POSITION: Pro Se Law Clerk OPENI...
