Two weeks after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard arguments about what it takes to preserve a demand for arbitration in an uninsured motorist case, the court took the unusual step of issuing an order that tweaked the question the court is preparing consider.
The move, which attorneys said they have never seen before, led Justice David N. Wecht to issue a statement clashing with the rest of the court over whether re-writing the question on appeal was proper.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
