The unprecedented request made by an amicus curiae in Tincher v. Omega Flex, which asked the state Supreme Court to grant reargument in the high-profile products liability case, has been denied.
The Pennsylvania Association for Justice had asked the high court in November to hear its separate arguments in the case, even though the justices heard from both the plaintiffs and defendants during an oral argument session in October. The court denied the request, according to a docket entry made today.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
