In its recruiting ads, the U.S. Army touts the importance of the army of one, the individual, in upholding the ideals in the Constitution. In the last U.S. Supreme Court term, it was essentially the army of two that defined many of those ideals for the nation.
The 2001-2002 term was largely “overshadowed by the events of the world,” said Douglas Kmiec, dean of Catholic University School of Law. “As a consequence, many of the cases this year, even though important to the litigants and advancing doctrine in one way or another, seemed far less significant in the overall scheme of the rule of law.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
