After last week’s guilty verdict against Arthur Andersen, proponents and opponents of multidisciplinary practice alike are waiting to see if the controversial concept should be added to the long list of victims of the now notorious accounting firm.
While opinions on the worth of MDPs have always varied, most experts agree that the jury that found Arthur Andersen guilty of obstruction of justice may also have inadvertently killed an idea that some think was already critically ill.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
