An insurance company incorrectly denied underinsured motorist benefits to a passenger injured in a U-Haul truck even though the policy only provided UIM coverage to her while she was in a “car,” the Superior Court has ruled.
The intermediate appeals court said that the Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co. policy violated public policy because it contradicted the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
