The government’s effort to restrict “virtual” child pornography, which only appears to depict minors, was swept aside by the Supreme Court yesterday as a First Amendment violation.

Justice Anthony Kennedy said the 1996 federal law “turns the First Amendment upside down” by outlawing protected speech as a way of banning unprotected child pornography. Kennedy’s strongly worded opinion used broad language that placed some of the material at issue in the same artistic category as Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]