The parents of two teen-age girls who were photographed in the nude without their parents’ knowledge or consent have lost a bid to revive a civil suit against the photographer and her husband.
In Doe v. Chamberlin, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that no jury could ever find that the photos of the 15- and 16-year-old girls violated the federal Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act because none of them was sexually suggestive or focused on “forbidden zones.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
