A “regularly used, non-owned car” exclusion in a motor vehicle insurance policy which precludes underinsured motorist coverage does not violate public policy, a divided state Supreme Court has ruled.
The ruling in Burstein v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co., PICS Case No. 02-1130 (Pa. July 17, 2002) Zappala, J.; Saylor, J. dissenting (55 pages), decides what had been a closely-watched unresolved issue within the insurance bar, namely, whether UIM benefits follow the person insured.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
