A nurse who claimed that she became unable to work around latex after she suffered a series of allergic reactions while on the job saw a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas jury last week return a verdict in favor of the defendant glove manufacturers.
Defense counsel Philip G. Kircher of Cozen O’Connor, who represented Safeskin, one of the manufacturers in the case, argued to the jurors that the woman was genetically predisposed to allergies, and that her reactions may not have been caused by the latex gloves that she wore while on the job.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
