Plaintiff did not aver sufficient facts to support a psychiatric medical malpractice action based on unauthorized disclosure of confidential information because he did not present evidence to establish how the psychiatrist knew or should have known the information at issue was confidential or how the disclosures caused plaintiff's injuries. Affirmed.
March 05, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Insurance defense firm located downtown Manhattan seeks an attorney with 3+ years experience to join our firm. We are a medium size insuran...
Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the Seattle office for an associate in the Taxation & Wealth Planning Department. The ...
Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the San Francisco, CA office for an associate in our Labor & Employment Department. Th...
