Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Sentence was procedurally and substantively reasonable where offense level adjustment would not have affected the Guidelines range due to the statutory maximum and district court gave appropriate consideration to aggravating and mitigating factors.
The court granted plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment and denied defendant's motions for summary judgment in two breach of contract cases in which former spouses of city police officers claimed to be entitled to pension payments and survivors benefits.
Appellant father appealed the court's order imposing a monthly child support obligation in favor of appellee mother. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed, holding in part that evidence of father's income and lifestyle supported a net monthly income calculation well above the annual salary figure quoted by father.
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court defended its order granting appellee County's motion for reconsideration and finding that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law in this case in which it was sued for personal injuries sustained by appellant, an inmate in the Bucks County Correctional Facility when he fell as he tried to reach the top bunk in his cell.
Court appointed public employee retirement funds as lead counsel over individual stockholder given the fact that the funds' claims were representative of the class and the funds had the resources and experience with securities class actions to zealously prosecute the case. Plaintiffs' motion for appointment as lead plaintiffs and appointment of lead counsel granted.
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged affirmance of its order denying a motion for reconsideration of its order denying appellant Russel Bleiler's motion to set aside the sheriff's sale of commercial property in favor of the bank.
The court rejected plaintiff's pro se complaint challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's sentencing policy for 18- to 20-year-olds and claiming violations of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Publication Date: 2024-11-15 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Todd Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 92 MAP 2021
Appellant appealed an order of the Superior Court affirming the trial court's judgment of sentence entered on her convictions for murder and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that appellant suffered no violation of her Confrontation Clause rights where the trial court admitted into evidence a redacted confession by her non-testifying co-defendant boyfriend, accompanied by a proper cautioning instruction to the jury.
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court requested that appellant's claims, in a case in which appellant was found to have sexually assaulted a fellow student when he squeezed her throat while kissing her, should be quashed or dismissed as untimely, waived, or lacking in merit.
The court affirmed the order of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas requiring appellant to submit to an independent medical examination by a qualified examiner selected by appellee.