• Becker v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Transportation

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Administrative Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Pellegrini
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0623

    The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Licensing did not err in applying §3806(b) of the Vehicle Code retroactively to impose a one-year suspension of licensee's operating privileges for a second DUI offense since the triggering date for suspension was the date licensee was sentenced, not the date he committed the underlying offense. The appellate court affirmed a trial court order upholding the suspension of licensee's driving privileges.

  • Dill v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. and Parole

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Leavitt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0631

    Parole revocation board was not obligated to hold revocation hearing until parole violator's return to state custody from serving out-of-state or federal sentence. Adjudication of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole affirmed.

  • Bd. of Supervisors of Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. et al

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Land Use and Planning
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Simpson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0624

    The trial court did not err in finding the res judicata defense unavailing to respondent, who was named in multiple zoning enforcement actions, since each of the seven enforcement actions covered a different period and, thus, the requisite identities were not present. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision.

  • City of Harrisburg v. Prince

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Discovery
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Wojcik
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0626

    The trial court did not err in finding that a spreadsheet containing information about donors to a City of Harrisburg fund set up to defray legal expenses associated with defending local firearm ordinances was not a "financial record" under the Right-to-Know Law and, thus, the spreadsheet was exempt from disclosure under the law's donor exception. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order.

  • Commonwealth v. Love

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Brobson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0629

    Search warrant to search for any game or wildlife parts overbroad where affidavit in support of probable cause referred solely to the unreported killing of a particular deer and retention of its parts in violation of the Game and Wildlife Code. Order of the trial court reversed, judgment of sentence vacated, case remanded.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    REITs: Mergers and Acquisitions

    Authors: David M. Einhorn, Adam O. Emmerich, Robin Panovka

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Friends of Lackawanna v. Dunmore Borough Zoning Hearing Bd.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-22
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Land Use and Planning
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Simpson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0616

    Trial court erred in striking objectors' appeal of the zoning board's holding that objectors lacked standing to appeal the zoning officer's pre-liminary opinion approving a landfill expansion because board erred in finding that objectors lacked standing since the discernable effects on objectors' use and enjoyment of their properties were not merely aesthetic concerns and raised legitimate concerns about air quality and health. Reversed and remanded.

  • Seda-Cog Joint Rail Auth. v. Carload Express, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-22
    Practice Area: Government
    Industry: Cargo and Shipping
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Simpson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0618

    Trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of authority, in dispute over the award of an operating agreement. Reversed.

  • Kerr v. Commonwealth

    Publication Date: 2018-05-22
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Covey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0613

    Petitioner's exceptions were overruled in his appeal of the denial of his petition as untimely filed because, despite having been advised of his appeal rights by October 22, 2009 at the latest, petitioner waited one and one-half years before filing his petition and he provided no explanation for the delay other than an alleged non-receipt of the notice, which was belied by the undisputed facts. Exceptions overruled.

  • A Pocono Country Place Prop. Owners Assoc., Inc. v. Kowalski

    Publication Date: 2018-05-22
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Real Estate
    Industry: Non-Profit | Real Estate
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Colins
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0602

    Defendant behavior toward other board directors of a planned community homeowners' association was boorish and unprofessional, but it did not warrant judicial intervention to remove him as a director under §5726(c) of the Nonprofit Corporation Law because it did not constitute fraud, dishonesty or gross mismanagement. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of plaintiffs' petition.

  • Clean Air Council v. Sunoco Pipeline L.P.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-15
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Land Use and Planning
    Industry: Energy | Non-Profit
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Brobson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0563

    The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs' challenges to defendant's use of eminent domain to construct two natural gas liquid pipelines since the Eminent Domain Code provided the exclusive procedure for challenging defendant's power and right to condemn property under the state and federal constitutions. The court reversed and remanded in part.