Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,359 results for '* court:"Commonwealth Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge McCullough
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 9 C.D. 2023
Refusal of chemical testing was conscious and voluntary where licensee's wrist discomfort did not prevent him from making a knowing decision and where police were not required to force arrestees to pay attention when being read implied consent warnings. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Court Administration
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 241 M.D. 2023
Respondent President Judge filed preliminary objections to petitioner's petition for review. The court sustained one of the preliminary objections and transferred the action to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, holding that it lacked original jurisdiction to resolve and grant relief regarding petitioner's challenges to administrative restrictions on cell phone use within the Court of Common Pleas.
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Leavitt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 290 C.D. 2023
Mortgagee was not entitled to mailed notice of pre-tax sale proceedings where they did not qualify as an "owner" under the Tax Sale Law. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Food and Beverage | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge McCullough
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 509 C.D. 2022
Licensee appealed the trial court's order upholding the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board's denial of licensee's application to renew its restaurant liquor license. The court affirmed, concluding in pertinent part that sufficient evidence supported the determination that licensee did not operate a bona fide restaurant where licensee had a demonstrated history of failing to operate a restaurant and undertook remedial measures only when its restaurant liquor license was at risk of revocation.
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Legal Services | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Dumas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 140 C.D. 2022
Property owner appealed the trial court's order granting township's motion to enforce a settlement agreement. The court reversed, holding the trial court abused its discretion in finding the existence of a valid and enforceable settlement agreement where the parties' negotiations remained ongoing and owner's prompt repudiation of a suggested settlement deprived his attorney of express authority to settle on his behalf.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-07-05
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cannon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 619 C.D. 2023
Applicant appealed from the trial court's order that affirmed the decision of a township zoning hearing board denying a special exception for a private recreational facility on applicant's property. The court affirmed, holding that there was no error in the denial of applicant's special exception use application where applicant failed to demonstrate that use of its property as a gun range was compatible, in nature and intensity, with the adjoining residential developments and the character of the zoning district and neighborhood where
Publication Date: 2024-07-05
Practice Area: Government
Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government | Transportation
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 8 M.D. 2024
Court rejected petitioners' constitutional challenge to law appointing special prosecutor to handle crimes occurring on Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority property, where the law did not improperly usurp petitioners' prosecutorial functions, did not violate defendants' equal protection or due process rights, and did not constitute a special or local law as it was directed to an instrumentality of the commonwealth. Petitioner's application for summary relief denied, respondent's cross-application granted. Intervenor's m
Publication Date: 2024-07-05
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Leavitt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 581 C.D. 2021
Property owners were not entitled to board of viewers where replacement of highway interchange constituted a "reconstruction" permitted under the existing permanent easement and there was no evidence of impairment of use or value of the property. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Insurance | Mining and Resources
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 120 C.D. 2023
Petitioners sought review of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board's order affirming a workers' compensation judge's decision that denied a petition for review of a compensation benefits award. The court affirmed, holding that the workers' compensation judge did not err by considering circumstances, including the timeliness and the manner in which an insurer handled a claim, when denying a corrective amendment to a Notice of Compensation Payable where the issue was the identity of the claimant's employer.
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Jubelirer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 805 C.D. 2023
Petitioners sought review of a letter in which respondent Pennsylvania Insurance Department's declined to vacate consent orders entered into by petitioners. The court quashed the appellate petition for review because respondent's letter was not an appealable adjudication.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read