Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
3,077 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Aerospace | State and Local Government | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Kennedy
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1982
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Commonwealth Court to affirm its Jan. 6, 2022, order granting motions in limine of plaintiff Robinson and defendant American Airlines, Inc. and ordering the City of Philadelphia to remain a party in this action and as a party on the verdict sheet.
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1037 CD 2024
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Commonwealth Court to affirm its May 21, 2024 order holding that it lacked jurisdiction to act further on the case involving the City's enforcement of the property maintenance code pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1701 because appellant had appealed the court's Final Order for Injunction imposing a statutory fine and reinspection fees and an order for demolition of the property in question. The docket revealed that appellant filed a notice of appeal from the order 52 days after the June 21, 2024 de
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2021 CV 2195
Defamation plaintiff sought reconsideration of the court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court denied plaintiff's motion, holding in part that plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the alleged falsity of defendants' published article, which indicated that defendant had a sexual relationship with an underage girl, where uncontroverted evidence showed that defendant had pled guilty to corruption of a minor involving sexual acts with a 15-year-old
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Street
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 230800104
City appealed the trial court's decision affirming a decision of the Office of Open Records regarding a Right to Know Law request. The court recommended that the matter be remanded for further proceedings where appellant filed its appeal a mere two days after filing a motion for reconsideration, which effectively deprived the court of the opportunity to prepare a new decision in light of the issue raised by appellant in its motion for reconsideration and subsequent notice of appeal.
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Foglietta
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00157
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Superior Court to affirm the decision of a jury that defendants did not breach the standard of care necessary to provide proper medical care and services to plaintiff's decedent.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Gary L. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Construction | Energy
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Fletman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 362
Defendant limited liability company filed preliminary objections to plaintiff's amended complaint. The court sustained defendant's preliminary objections based on improper venue, holding that venue in Philadelphia County was improper where the quantity and quality of defendant's contacts with the county, which reflected essentially no contacts whatsoever, demonstrated that defendant did not regularly conduct business there.
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Bright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 0478
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the court urged that the Superior Court find that it did not abuse its discretion or err in its order which granted remittitur reducing punitive damages to $1 million, granting delay damages in the amount of $59,092.46, and the resulting total damages against appellees of $2,259,092.46.
Publication Date: 2024-11-01
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Gardner
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-20425
Plaintiff petitioned for an interpretation of the phrase "financial net worth" as found in her prenuptial agreement with defendant. The court concluded that in the context of the parties' prenuptial agreement the phrase "financial net worth" meant the value of the parties' financial accounts and did not include defendant's real estate holdings and pension.
Publication Date: 2024-11-01
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Fletman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01768
Plaintiff sought class certification in her action alleging violation of the Philadelphia Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Ordinance. The court granted the motion, certifying plaintiff's class to consist of all persons who were asked a question regarding a criminal conviction during defendants' online job application process for a specified period after enactment of the Ban the Box Law in 2016.
Publication Date: 2024-11-01
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Chester County
Judge: Judge Verwey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2022-04233-MJ
The court reaffirmed its original order compelling arbitration of a shareholders' dispute involving a corporation and a shareholders' agreement that provided that disputes would be resolved in arbitration before a single commercial transactions attorney acceptable to all parties.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read