• Commonwealth v. Aunkst

    Publication Date: 2017-12-26
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Lovecchio
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1785

    The court did not err in imposing a post-revocation sentence, because defendant continued to have substance abuse issues and he failed to comply with his probation conditions despite having numerous opportunities to participate in treatment and rehabilitation programs.

  • Commonwealth v. Garms

    Publication Date: 2017-12-26
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Lovecchio
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1519

    The court refused to suppress the test results of a blood draw taken from defendant on the night she was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol where defendant provided voluntary consent to the blood draw. The court denied defendants motion to suppress.

  • Commonwealth v. Glasgow

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lehigh County
    Judge: Judge Steinberg
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1796

    The Probation and Parole Board had exclusive authority to decide questions regarding parole matters. The court of common pleas lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear defendants appeal regarding his parole, because appeals from the boards parole revocation and recommitment orders were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the commonwealth court.

  • Nye v. Shipman

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Gray
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1798

    The court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the boundary line referenced in a deed included a light pole on the east side of the road, rather than the one on the west side, because the location of the light pole on the east side was more consistent with the acreage specified in the deed.

  • Commonwealth v. Portanova

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Butts
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1799

    The court denied a motion to suppress the results of a chemical blood test where the defendant voluntarily consented to the testing.

  • Commonwealth v. Masker

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Butts
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1797

    The court denied defendants motion to suppress with regard to chemical test results following a traffic stop where the court found no evidence of coercion and defendant voluntarily signed a form consenting to a blood draw.

  • In re: Interest of BNK

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge McCoy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1793

    The commonwealth failed to follow the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure in petitioning to withdraw nolle prossed charges against the juvenile defendant and failed to demonstrate grounds for vacating the actions of an assistance district attorney who was authorized to bind the commonwealth in juvenile cases. The court denied the commonwealths petition to vacate nolle prossed charges.

  • Sanchez v. Nikparvar

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Carbon County
    Judge: Judge Matika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1800

    The court held that a party waived his right to appeal where the court previously ordered him to file a concise statement of errors regarding issues on appeal, and he failed to do so.

  • In re: Estate of Kuntz

    Publication Date: 2017-12-19
    Practice Area: Damages | Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Butts
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1794

    Appellant, an auction company allegedly damaged when a court halted an auction sale, could not recover equitable relief since it failed to properly preserve such a claim in this suit and came before the court with unclean hands regarding its knowledge of the alleged breaching parties. The court recommended affirmance of its order denying appellant relief.

  • Croucher v. Sims Automotive et al

    Publication Date: 2017-12-12
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Corporate Entities | Personal Injury
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Northampton County
    Judge: Judge Baratta
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1780

    Plaintiffs complaint failed to sufficiently state a cause of action for piercing the corporate veil of the defendant corporations where it merely recited the four elements necessary to demonstrate such a claim but failed to set forth substantiating facts. The court overruled defendants preliminary objection to allow for discovery.