Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
3,077 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2022-17987
The court urged the Superior Court to dismiss plaintiff's appeal of the court's order denying plaintiff's motion for recusal for want of appellate jurisdiction and noted that its decision on the recusal motion was based on established principles of law.
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Higgins
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 0037 CV 2023
The court denied appellants' appeal of the Zoning Board's decision affirming an enforcement notice directing appellants to cease using their property as a multi-family dwelling in an "A" zoning district.
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Expert Witnesses
Industry: Automotive | Construction | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10318 of 2021, C.A.
Defendants sought reconsideration of the court's order precluding their tendered expert testimony regarding the source of defects in a truck engine that plaintiff had rebuilt. The court denied the motion, holding that defendants could not introduce expert opinion testimony regarding defects in the rebuilt truck engine where their expert's report did not attribute the defects to plaintiff's work and stated further that no proper diagnosis of the engine could be made without disassembling the unit, which had not been done.
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 159 OF 2024
Defendant filed an omnibus pretrial motion consisting of a motion to suppress evidence derived from a motor vehicle stop and a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court granted the motion and the petition, holding that a state trooper lacked reasonable suspicion to pull over defendant for driving under the influence where a dash cam recording showed that the tires on defendant's vehicle momentarily touched his traffic lane's center line and fog line on several occasions, but without crossing over the lines.
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Djerassi
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2207
Defendant moved to amend his pro se petition to open judgment. The court denied the motion where defendant, after obtaining counsel, offered no new arguments beyond those already considered and rejected by a prior court which had denied his petition in the interim.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Joseph S. Britton
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2007-12707
Appellants appealed the court's orders finding them in contempt and awarding appellees compensatory and coercive sanctions. The court concluded that its orders should be affirmed where appellants explicitly and repeatedly violated an agreed and stipulated order regarding arbitration between the parties and continued to defy the court while failing to provide complete discovery regarding the amount of sanctions to be imposed.
Publication Date: 2024-10-04
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Jacquinto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 220201636
In its § 1925(a) opinion, the court explained that the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal of its finding in favor of cross-appellant and against appellant that was contained in a January 23, 2024, order that was received on January 25, 2024, but not entered as a judgment on the docket. The only final order in this case that would be amenable to appeal was the court's May 24, 2024, order denying appellant and cross-appellant's post-trial motions and entering judgment on the docket for which the deadline to file a timely
Publication Date: 2024-09-27
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Zulick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2031 CV 2023
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's slip and fall complaint.
Publication Date: 2024-09-27
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Zulick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 6896 CV 2023
The court dismissed the complaint upon defendants' demurrer to the cause of action for breach of a conditional gift, but gave plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint. This dismissal followed the dismissal of the first complaint filed by plaintiffs, parents to Lukasz Lasak, seeking the reformation of the deeds to two properties conveyed to the son in fee simple. The parents paid for the properties with the understanding that they would have a life estate in the properties and collect the rent during their lifetimes. The c
Publication Date: 2024-09-27
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Hill
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 02319
Appellant filed multiple appeals of various of the trial court's orders and an adverse jury verdict in his personal injury action against appellee. The court requested that the appeals be dismissed, holding in pertinent part that appellant's claims were waived for his failure to file a post-trial motion or to mention the issues in his 1925(b) statement. The court held further, that it did not err in granting a defense motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing appellant's claims against appellee's wife where appellant alleged
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read