Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
15 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas Cumberland County"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-06-15
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Smith
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0494
The court denied, as untimely, defendant's motion for reconsideration of a protection from abuse order since under §6117 of the Protection from Abuse Act, aggrieved parties must either file an appeal or motion to reconsider within 30 days, and the motion itself must be acted upon within those 30 days. The court dismissed defendant's motion.
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Placey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0487
The executor of an estate proceeded at his own peril when he continued operating the decedent's rental business in contravention of a provision in the decedent's will which required the property to be sold.
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Smith
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0493
The court rejected employer's argument that defendant's at-will employment extended the three-year term of a restrictive covenant within his employment contract and thus found that defendant could not breach a contract that did not apply to him. The court sustained defendant's preliminary objection.
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Placey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0488
A decedent's unused burial plots passed to her three children as tenants in common. Interment rights associated with these plots did not extend to the spouses of the co-owners unless the other co-owners consented.
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Masland
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0463
Even though wife resided in the family home after the parties' separation, husband's payment of the mortgage did not warrant a reduction in his interim support obligation. The court dismissed husband's exceptions to the support master's report and recommendations.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Hyams
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0489
The court sustained husband's exception to the support master's report and recommendations regarding the payment of health insurance premiums, but denied other exceptions pertaining to the payment of the children's unreimbursed medical expenses and husband's credits for his period of unemployment.
Publication Date: 2020-06-08
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Masland
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0464
Where father was held in contempt for failing to report a "significant change" in his income and the case was remanded for a calculation of arrearages due, a support master properly conducted only a calculation of arrearages and did not err in failing to consider the complete components of the child support calculations. The court of common pleasdismissed father's exceptions.
Publication Date: 2020-06-01
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Masland
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0467
Factual issues existed in this mortgage foreclosure matter regarding defendant's receipt of notices and whether plaintiff was the holder of the note. The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the defense of unclean hands, but denied all other aspects of the motion.
Publication Date: 2020-06-01
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Masland
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0466
The court rejected wife's exceptions to the report and recommendations of the support master, except for an error in calculating certain expenses relating to the parties' minor child.
Publication Date: 2020-06-01
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Cumberland County
Judge: Judge Masland
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0465
A support master properly found that wife's delay in seeking modification of a support award was not unreasonable given husband's varied and evolving financial circumstances. The court dismissed the parties' exceptions to the support master's report and recommendation.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read