Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
368 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas Lawrence County"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-03-29
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 70112 OF 2023, M.D.
Petitioner appealed the suspension/recall of his driving privileges. The court sustained petitioner's appeal and struck the recall of his driver's license.
Publication Date: 2024-03-22
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10166 of 2023, C.A.
The trial court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant from operating a short-term rental facility at the Colonial Flowline Building in New Castle in violation of the applicable authorized use restrictions in Zoning District I-1.
Publication Date: 2024-03-22
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10257 OF 2023, C.A.
Defendant son filed preliminary objections to plaintiff's complaint seeking recovery of the unpaid balance for his deceased mother's skilled nursing care. The court sustained the preliminary objection that plaintiff's complaint lacked requisite specificity where it failed to aver whether its agreement for the mother's care was oral or written and, if written, no copy was provided with plaintiff's complaint. The court overruled defendant's preliminary objection that the complaint lacked specificity by failing to set forth special damag
Publication Date: 2024-02-09
Practice Area: Government
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 70005 OF 2020,M.D.
Appellants, the City of New Castle and its police pension review board, appealed the court's decision awarding survivor benefits to appellees, the ex-wives of two deceased police officers. In a §1925(a) opinion, the court justified its opinion and order granting appellees' petitions for review and asked the Commonwealth Court to deny appellants' appeal.
Publication Date: 2024-01-29
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10310 OF 2022, C.A.
The court's opinion justified its overruling defendants' preliminary objections to plaintiff's second amended complaint which claimed that the defendants committed fraud and fraud in the inducement when they had a verbal and email agreement for defendants to sell a property to plaintiff that was uninhabitable and plaintiff then invested effort and money into restoring the property while it was leased to them after which defendant Barkey refused to sell at the originally agreed price resulting in unjust enrichment and a claim for reimb
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-01-29
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Cox
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 16 OF 2023
The court issued an order denying defendant's pre-trial motions to suppress for unlawful search and entry, for unlawfully issued search warrant, illegal nighttime warrant, a request for discovery and inspection of evidence, but granted in part defendant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus on three charges of aggravated indecent assault forcible compulsion.
Publication Date: 2024-01-08
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Acker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 14 of 2021,D.P.
Petitioner Lawrence County Children and Youth Services filed a petition for the involuntary termination of parental rights of the natural mother and natural father of A.H. Mother voluntarily relinquished her parental rights. The court denied the petition as to the father, finding petitioner failed to prove the statutory grounds for involuntary termination of father's parental rights father.
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Cox
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10635 OF 2022
Defendant appealed the court's order granting plaintiffs' petition for rule to show cause and complaint in ejectment. The court concluded that defendant's appeal should be dismissed where the parties' prior arbitration on defendant's default under an installment land contract was a nullity because the plaintiffs' suit involved title to realty.
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10228 of 2021, C.A.
Plaintiffs filed suit for eviction, ejectment and damages arising out of a lease of residential property to defendant. The court denied plaintiffs' claims where they failed to establish their damages from a purported water leak at the property or other grounds that allegedly warranted defendant's ejectment.
Publication Date: 2023-11-20
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10166 OF 2023, C.A.
Plaintiff township sought a preliminary injunction prohibiting defendant property owner from utilizing its property as an online short-term rental facility in violation of the township zoning ordinance. The court granted the motion, observing that while defendant had ceased using its facility as a short-term rental, there was no evidence that defendant's facility had been altered in such a way that it could not be operated as a short-term rental once more, and thus the issue was not moot and entry of a preliminary injunction was warra
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read