Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
122 results for '* judge:"District Judge Baylson"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-15
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Distribution and Wholesale | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-2087
Defendants moved to dismiss certain counts of plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim. The court denied the motion, holding that plaintiff's claims for conversion, tortious interference with business relations, and defamation and commercial trade disparagement were not precluded by the gist of the action doctrine where plaintiff plausibly alleged violations of broader social duties not grounded in the parties' warehousing and shipping agreement.
Publication Date: 2024-11-15
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-3254
Court declined to dismiss account holder's fraudulent transfers claim where there was insufficient evidence to prove holder had approved a loan transfer where the scammer called her from the financial institution's customer service line. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2024-11-01
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Consulting | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-5553
The court found that plaintiff had an implied in fact contract with defendant to provide consultant services for which it would be paid fees to assist defendant in remediating compliance violations asserted by the Food and Drug Administration and that the evidence established unjust enrichment or promissory estoppel. While plaintiff claimed it was owed $1.9 million in unpaid fees, the court determined that the recovery would be limited to breach or an equitable remedy.
Publication Date: 2024-09-20
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Automotive | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-01447
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) in a putative class action involving alleged overtime violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Missouri Minimum Wage Laws.
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: E-Commerce | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 16-573
Both parties filed post-judgment motions after second jury deadlocked on whether plaintiff Uber drivers were misclassified as independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act and court drew on its inherent authority to dismiss this case with prejudice and granted defendant's rule 50(b) motion for relief. Motion granted.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-07-19
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-1456
Defendant employer moved to dismiss plaintiff's discriminatory termination suit for failure to state a claim. The court granted in part and denied in part defendant's motion, holding in pertinent part that plaintiff's Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim survived dismissal where it stated a viable claim by alleging as facts that plaintiff was over the age of forty, was qualified for the job from which he was terminated, and his replacement was a person of significantly younger age.
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-1995
Age/gender discrimination claims failed where plaintiff failed to demonstrate a causal connection between her non-renewal and discriminatory animus and where defendant had a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its employment decision. Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted.
Publication Date: 2024-06-07
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-5030
Lanham Act and state law claims arising from misappropriation of likeness were timely under the doctrine of laches and the discovery rule, given defendants' apparent attempt to conceal the true identity of the persons in the misappropriated images. Defendants' motion to dismiss denied.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-2587
All parties sought full or partial summary judgment in plaintiff teachers' consolidated actions alleging Equal Pay Act violations and related claims. Defendant school district also sought decertification of one plaintiff's collective action. The court denied all relief based upon the existence of genuine issues of material fact and the continued propriety of the collective action litigation.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-4287
Challenge to local use and occupancy ordinance failed where plaintiff did not suffer a due process violation and where the ordinance had been amended to comply with state law and thus was not preempted. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read