Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
26 results for '* judge:"District Judge Mannion"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-11-16
Practice Area: Education Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-1252
School district moved to dismiss plaintiff student's action asserting intentional discrimination on the basis of her disabilities in violation of the Rehabilitation Act and the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment and court found complaint concerned the denial of a FAPE, student's injuries related to a FAPE and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2020-10-26
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-1168
Both parties moved for motions in limine in plaintiffs' Title VII and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act action and court found plaintiff did not need to present expert testimony as to his future earnings, attorney-client privilege applied to county solicitor but he could be questioned about matters that fell within the crime-fraud exception and plaintiff did not establish the qualifications of his human resources and management procedures expert. Granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2020-08-10
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Insurance | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0856
Discovery requests denied where plaintiffs, who alleged that they were in competition with defendant, requested defendant's confidential and proprietary business information, such that a protective order would be insufficient to protect defendant's interests. Plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery denied.
Publication Date: 2020-07-20
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0776
County moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's title VII and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act retaliation and hostile work environment action and court found plaintiff sufficiently established all elements of his title VII retaliation claim including an adverse employment action where he showed protected activity, felt compelled to resign his position, his new position was clearly a demotion and there was a "temporal proximity" between his protected activities and the retaliatory response. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2020-07-20
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0776
County moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's title VII and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act retaliation and hostile work environment action and court found plaintiff sufficiently established all elements of his title VII retaliation claim including an adverse employment action where he showed protected activity, felt compelled to resign his position, his new position was clearly a demotion and there was a "temporal proximity" between his protected activities and the retaliatory response. Motion denied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-07-13
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0738
Defendant moved for compassionate release and transfer to home confinement based on the COVID-19 pandemic and court found it lacked jurisdiction because defendant failed to exhaust his BOP administrative remedies. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2020-04-13
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0391
Plaintiff server and defendants, restaurant and manager, moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act, Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law, Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act and retaliation action over manager taking a percentage of plaintiff's tips and court found manager's participation in the tip pool was a violation of the FLSA and MWA but plaintiff's complaint to her coworker did not qualify as protected activity and her retaliation claim failed. Motions granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2020-01-20
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0048
Defendant moved to suppress evidence found in his cell phones asserting the 25-day delay between the seizure and the warrant application was constitutionally unreasonable and court found the delay was not so unreasonable as to violate defendant's fourth amendment rights. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2019-12-16
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1444
Plaintiff granted leave to amend collective and class action complaint where official opt-in notice period would give plaintiff definitive notice of plaintiffs in other states and potentially other state law claims. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend granted.
Publication Date: 2019-12-16
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mannion
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1446
Prison inmate's failure to supervise claim based on supervisory liability constituted impermissible extension of Bivens framework where prisoners had adequate remedies and such claims implicated matters of prison administration. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings granted in part and denied in part.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read