Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
8 results for '* judge:"Judge Cosgrove"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2018-01-23
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Civil Procedure | Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0069
Board erred in applying the mailbox rule to employers assertion that it never received the notice of hearing regarding claimants first hearing because there was no evidence of record or testimony demonstrating that the notice was signed in the regular course of business and placed in the regular place of mail. Vacated.
Publication Date: 2018-01-16
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0031
Trial court erred in finding that a summer house was a permitted use that did not require a development right and that appellees had a vested right in not having a development right attached to the summer house because based on the record, it was not possible to determine if the summer house constituted a tenant dwelling and it was not clear whether the township knew of the exact use to which the summer house was put. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2018-01-16
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0022
City had just cause to pass over applicant for firefighter position for failure to comply with residency requirement, where applicant failed to produce evidence that he resided within city limits at least one year prior to his application. Order of the City of Pittsburgh Civil Service Commission affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-01-02
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Education Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 171840
Petitioners challenge to his removal as chair of the school reform commission was denied because §696 of the school code did not apply since the position of chair of the SRC was not an office and the governor had the power to remove petitioner from a position that had no duties or role assigned to it. Relief denied.
Publication Date: 2017-12-26
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Labor Law
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1850
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review erred in denying benefits to employee who was terminated for refusing to undergo fingerprinting for employer-mandated background checks, where the employee held a sincere religious belief commanding against fingerprinting. Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review reversed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2017-11-21
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning | Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1705
Owner of property subject to a de facto taking not entitled to the greatest sum of delay compensation possible, where the Eminent Domain Code required the property owner to be compensated for the just value of the taken property as close as practical to the date of taking. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2017-10-31
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Public Records
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1620
The court used alternative reasoning to affirm the OAGs denial of a RTKL request for a report generated by a law firm investigating crimes arising from or related to the commonwealths email system because while the OAG argued that the report was exempt under the attorney-client and attorney-work-product privileges and the predecisional and noncriminal investigation exemptions, the court focused on whether the appendices sought were part of the record and encompassed by the RTKL request at the time the request was made. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2017-10-10
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cosgrove
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1546
The court granted counsels petition to withdraw because counsels no-merit letter met the technical requirements of Turner/Finley and convicted parole violators claims that the board did not have the authority to alter his judicially-imposed sentence beyond his original maximum term.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read