Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
99 results for '* judge:"Judge Linhardt"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-01-30
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-22-00342
The Zoning Hearing Board of Nippenose Township erred in finding that appellant's home addition constituted "new construction" under the township's floodplain ordinance where the subject language was ambiguous and did not clearly to refer to projects that merely expand existing structures or buildings. The court issued an order granting appellant's land use appeal.
Publication Date: 2023-01-30
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-22-00677
The court granted plaintiff's motion to dismiss appeal on the basis that defendant failed to comply with service requirements in violation of Pa.R.C.P.M.D.J. 1005. Although the court discussed that they had discretion to grant defendant's appeal upon a showing of good cause, they noted that defendant failed to plead any facts demonstrating good cause for missing the service timeline.
Publication Date: 2023-01-23
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-22-00444
Plaintiff's allegations were insufficient to support his claim for punitive damages as the complaint arising from his alleged experience with bed bugs at defendants' hotel did not aver facts sufficient to support a conclusion that defendants' purported conduct went beyond mere negligence. The court sustained in part defendants' preliminary objections.
Publication Date: 2023-01-23
Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: OC-41-20-0062
Petitioner, who claimed to be the decedent's daughter and sole heir, could not compel decedent's parents to submit to genetic testing in order to ascertain whether she was in fact decedent's daughter because the court lacked authority to compel the putative grandparents to submit to such testing. The court denied petitioner's request.
Publication Date: 2023-01-16
Practice Area: Election and Political Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-22-00115
As the state legislature intended §2648 of the Election Code to provide broad public access to the documents and records of county boards of elections, the limited exceptions to public access in that provision could not be used to shield Lycoming County ClearVote Cast Vote records from public access. The court ordered production of documents.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-01-16
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-01056
Allegations that defendant altered an easement on a tract of land such that plaintiffs could only access their property by using a particular vehicle, which was likely to be damaged due to the alterations, were sufficient to support causes of action for interference with the use of the easement and trespass upon property rights. The court overruled defendant's preliminary objections.
Publication Date: 2023-01-16
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-22-00570
While the parties' contract gave defendant unilateral discretion to cancel a distributorship contract if it reached the opinion that a distributor was involved in criminal activity, employer was required to have some good faith basis to reach that conclusion, necessitating discovery in this matter. The court overruled defendant's preliminary objection.
Publication Date: 2023-01-02
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-22-00574
While the rules of civil procedure, including those governing discovery, do not apply to Right-to-Know Law appeals such as this, the court had authority to order certain discovery in order to promote the fair and efficient adjudication of the matter regarding the discoverability of public records. The court granted petitioner's motion to compel in part.
Publication Date: 2022-11-21
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-01104
The court partially granted a motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiff could not bring an action to quiet title as plaintiff failed to establish that they were in "possession" of the disputed property at the time the complaint was filed. The court rather found that defendants were in possession of the property due to the fact that they routinely maintained the property, had placed a no trespassing sign on the property, and their land survey revealed that their property slightly encroached onto the disputed parcel.
Publication Date: 2022-10-10
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-00041
The court rejected petitioner's claim that corporate records stored electronically and accessible in Pennsylvania were subject to discovery under 15 Pa. C.S. §1508 since the documents' theoretic accessibility within the state was insufficient to put those documents within the court's jurisdiction and render them "located within Pennsylvania." The court denied petitioner's petition to compel.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read