Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
31 results for '* judge:"Judge Matey"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-13
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2374
Plaintiff appealed the grant of summary judgment to defendant, plaintiff's former employer, on her claims of discrimination and retaliation.
Publication Date: 2023-12-21
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1862
Petitioner appealed the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus and the denial of his motion for reconsideration.
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2043
Defendant appealed the denial of his motion for compassionate release.
Publication Date: 2023-09-25
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Hayden Nelson-Major, Federal Community Defender Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine C. Thompson, Federal Community Defender Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Capital Habeas Unit, Philadelphia, PA for appellant.
for defendant: Shoshana D. Silverstein, Philadelphia County Office of District Attorney, Philadelphia, PA for appellees.
Case Number: 21-2601
Trial counsel was deficient in failing to object to trial judge's admonishment of witness that may have influenced the witness's decision to change their testimony favorable to the defense and failing to cross-examine the witness regarding their changed testimony.
Publication Date: 2023-09-18
Practice Area: Energy and Natural Resources
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1280
District court erred in failing to consider whether it could continue with a declaratory judgment action seeking interpretation of contractual rights when the district court could not join all parties to the contract without destroying diversity jurisdiction and whether plaintiff would have another remedy if the district court could not hear the case. Order of the district court remanded.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Gary L. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-09-18
Practice Area: Energy and Natural Resources
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew A. Fitzgerald, McGuireWoods, Richmond, VA; Gregory J. Krock, McGuireWoods, Pittsburgh, PA; Elizabeth M. Thomas, McGuireWoods, Charlotte, NC for appellant.
for defendant: Richard L. Armezzani, Daniel T. Brier, John B. Dempsey, Nicholas F. Kravitz, Myers Brier & Kelly, Scranton, PA for appellee.
Case Number: 22-1280
Court remanded for district court to join other parties to a joint operating agreement since adjudicating the case would necessarily implicate those parties' contractual rights and obligations.
Publication Date: 2023-07-24
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Aubre Dean, Kevin A. Meehan, Juan O. Perla, Joseph D. Pizzurro, and Allesandra D. Tyler, Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle, New York, NY for appellant.
for defendant: Jonathan M. Albano, Christopher L. Carter, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Boston, MA; Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Wilmington, DE; James D. Nelson, David B. Salmons, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Washington, DC; Laura D. Jones, Peter J. Keane, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, Wilmington, DE; Robert H. Poole, II, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA; Rajat Rana, Alexander A. Yanos, Alston & Bird, New York, NY; Joshua S. Bolian, Riley & Jacobson, Nashville, TN; Marie McManus Degnan, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James E. Berger, DLA Piper, New York, NY; R. Craig Martin, DLA Piper, Wilmington, DE; Katherine G. Connolly, Norton Rose Fulbright, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew H. Kirtland, Norton Rose Fulbright, Washington, DC; Kevin J. Mangan, Stephanie S. Riley, Matthew P. Ward, Womble Bond Dickinson, Wilmington, DE; Ginger D. Anders, Kathleen A. Foley, Elaine J. Goldenberg, Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Sarah Weiner, Munger Tolles & Olson, Washington, DC for appellees.
Case Number: 23-1647
Despite Venezuela's opposition leader being recognized by the U.S. as the legitimate leader of the Venezuelan government, the continued exercise of extensive control by the opposition leader and his rival over Venezuela's national oil company meant the company continued as the alter ego of Venezuela and its assets remained subject to attachment to satisfy Venezuela's judgment debts.
Publication Date: 2023-07-18
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1618
Plaintiffs appealed the district court's grant of defendants' motion to compel arbitration.
Publication Date: 2022-08-22
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Health Care | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0935
The district court did not err in denying a motion to compel arbitration where the defendant was not a signatory to the arbitration agreement at issue, and agency principles did not allow that defendant to enforce the arbitration agreement between plaintiff and a related corporate entity. The appellate court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2022-05-23
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Aerospace | Food and Beverage | Retail
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0566
District court properly dismissed appellant's antitrust act claims over airport concession lease provisions that gave landlord the right to grant a beverage manufacturer exclusive control over all non-alcoholic beverage products sold and served at the airport because appellant lacked antitrust standing and did not adequately plead a violation of §1 of the Sherman Act. Affirmed.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read