• Genser v. Butler County Bd. of Elections

    Publication Date: 2024-11-15
    Practice Area: Election and Political Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 26 WAP 2024

    Mail ballots not contained in secrecy envelopes were void, thus entitling voters who had failed to comply with the secrecy envelope requirement to have their provisional ballots counted. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pisanchyn

    Publication Date: 2024-11-08
    Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2914 DD3

    Disciplinary Board's imposition of discipline, based upon the preparation and presentation of a fee petition in federal court on behalf of respondent's law firm's clients reversed. The court found that Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5 and 8.4(d) did not apply to these circumstances. The petition for discipline was dismissed.

  • Commonwealth v. Jones

    Publication Date: 2024-11-08
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 31 EAP 2021

    Court ruled that co-defendant's statement violated defendant's Confrontation Clause rights where redactions, in light of the commonwealth's presentation of the case, were insufficient to prevent the jury from understanding that the statement referred to defendant. Order of the superior court reversed, case remanded.

  • Pearlstein v. Commonwealth

    Publication Date: 2024-10-18
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21 MAP 2023

    Deferral of gains from like-kind exchanges of property was not permissible where such a method did not "clearly reflect" a taxpayer's income as defined by the Tax Reform Code. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Thomas

    Publication Date: 2024-10-11
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 808 CAP

    Appellant appealed the dismissal of his Post Conviction Relief Act petition after he was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that appellant failed to demonstrate intentional or reckless prosecutorial misconduct where the prosecutor in his case relied on a documentary exhibit to refresh a testifying police officer's memory regarding a fact later contradicted by other police officers.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lancaster County & Berks County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Stadium Casino RE, LLC v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Bd.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-02
    Practice Area: Administrative Law
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20 MM 2023

    Unsuccessful category 4 slot machine license bidder challenged board's grant of the license and court found 4 Pa.C.S. §1305.2(c) was a jurisdictional provision, satisfaction of which had to be met before board could consider an application submitted by the auction winner but that section only defined board's conduct in connection with Category 4 slot machine license auctions, not its competency to preside over auction, application and licensing proceedings. Affirmed.

  • MFW Wine Co., LLC v. Liquor Control Bd.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-12
    Practice Area: Administrative Law
    Industry: Food and Beverage | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 75 MAP 2022

    Commonwealth Court did not err in allowing mandamus damages in appellees' actions against the liquor control board for failing to perform its duty to implement direct shipment of orders to customers because PLCB was a "person" subject to mandamus damages under 42 Pa. C.S. §8303 and sovereign immunity did not bar mandamus damages sought pursuant to that provision. Affirmed.

  • Ferraro v. Patterson-Erie Corp.

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1 WAP 2023

    Making only one attempt to serve process after filing a complaint and waiting eight months to effect service, after the limitations period would have expired, did not constitute good faith diligence at timely serving process. Order of the superior court reversed.

  • Kramer v. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Insurance
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 103 MAP 2022

    In a case arising from the death of a youth from an overdose of illegal drugs in the home of appellants, the court reversed a ruling of the Superior Court that emotional distress damages were covered under an insurance policy providing liability coverage for bodily injury when the policy excluded emotional distress from its definition of bodily injury.

  • In the Interest of: N.E.M.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-05
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 8 EAP 2023

    Juveniles adjudicated delinquent and ordered to out-of-home placement could seek expedited review of their placement as of right, with the superior court not having the discretion to deny review. Order of the superior court reversed.