• Commonwealth v. Foster

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-1009

    The trial court erred in finding that defendant violated his probation by posting certain photographs of guns, drugs and cash on social media since the court was required to find that defendant violated a specific condition of probation or committed a new crime to be found in violation under 42 Pa.C.S. §9771. The high court reversed and remanded.

  • Menkowitz v. Peerless Publ'ns, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-08-05
    Practice Area: Litigation
    Industry: Health Care | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0903

    The intermediate appellate court erred in reversing a trial court order denying defendants in this defamation lawsuit judgment notwithstanding the verdict as the court did not review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as verdict winner. The high court reversed and remanded.

  • Millcreek Twp. Sch. Dist. v. Millcreek Twp. Educ. Support Personnel Ass'n

    Publication Date: 2019-07-29
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0877

    Commonwealth court erred in substituting its interpretation of the parties' collective bargaining agreement for that of an arbitrator's interpretation where the essence test under the Public Employees Relations Act required the courts to defer to the arbitrator's findings of fact, which demonstrated that the arbitrator's interpretation was rationally derived from the CBA. Order of the commonwealth court reversed.

  • In re: Estate of Easterday

    Publication Date: 2019-07-08
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0771

    Divorcing spouse was not required to seek benefits from deceased spouse under divorce code where deceased spouse had not filed valid affidavit of consent and therefore grounds for divorce had not yet been established. Order of the superior court affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Hlubin

    Publication Date: 2019-06-17
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0697

    Denial of motion to suppress evidence from DUI checkpoint overruled where checkpoint was operated by police outside of primary jurisdiction without a valid Intergovernmental Cooperation Act agreement. Order of the superior court reversed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024

    Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Slice of Life, LLC v. Hamilton Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.

    Publication Date: 2019-05-13
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
    Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0529

    Commonwealth court erred in reversing zoning board's finding that appellee violated the zoning ordinance by using house in a district restricted to single family dwellings as a transient rental property because a purely transient use of a property was incompatible with the definition of "family" defined as "a single housekeeping unit" in zoning ordinance Reversed.

  • Gavin v. Loeffelbein

    Publication Date: 2019-04-08
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0391

    Superior court erred in sua sponte invalidating emergency guardianship order based on automatic expiration when proper avenue to challenge order was in initial proceeding before orphans' court. Order of the superior court vacated, case remanded.

  • In the Interest of L.J.B., a minor

    Publication Date: 2019-01-15
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0002

    Because the Child Protective Services Law's definition of "child" did not include a fetus or unborn child, a pregnant woman's drug abuse causing injury to the child upon birth did not render her a "perpetrator" of child abuse because there was no "child" at the time of mother's alleged acts of abuse. Order of the superior court reversed.

  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    Publication Date: 2018-11-06
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-1328

    Commonwealth's confession of error on an allegation of ineffective assistance of penalty phase counsel could not obviate court's obligation to conduct judicial review of defendant's claim and defendant's obligation to prove merits of claim. Order of the PCRA court affirmed.

  • City of Philadelphia Fire Dept. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

    Publication Date: 2018-11-06
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Employment Litigation | Evidence
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-1319

    In an opinion announcing the judgment of the court, the high court held that §108(r) of the Workers' Compensation Act, which deals specifically with firefighters, only requires a claimant to establish a general causative link between the type of cancer suffered and a Group 1 carcinogen and that where a claimant has established entitlement to the evidentiary presumption of compensability under §301(f) of the Act, epidemiological evidence is not sufficient to rebut the presumption. The high court reversed and remanded for further procee