Filter This View

  • Marion v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.

    Publication Date: 2023-02-06
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 72 MAP 2021

    Court expressly adopted aiding and abetting fraud as a cause of action, which required proving that a defendant had actual knowledge of an underlying fraud and actively provided assistance or encouragement. Order of the superior court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

  • Cent. Dauphin Sch. Dist. v. Hawkins

    Publication Date: 2023-01-09
    Practice Area: Public Records
    Industry: Education | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 88 MAP 2021

    School district could meet obligations under the Right-to-Know Law and restrictions imposed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act by producing bus surveillance video after redacting any student images or personally identifiable information from the video. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

  • In the Interest of K.N.L.

    Publication Date: 2022-11-07
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1 EAP 2022

    Trial court applied an incorrect analysis to appellant's petition to intervene in an adoption based on his in loco parentis status and the correct standard reviewed whether a non-foster-parent third party had a substantial and genuine interest in formalizing a permanent parental relationship with child and an individual's previously held in loco parentis status might demonstrate that interest. Reversed.

  • Commonwealth v. Lopez

    Publication Date: 2022-08-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22-0964

    Trial court was not obligated under rules of criminal procedure to conduct ability to pay hearing prior to imposing mandatory court costs, where rule governing imposition of costs or restitution by its terms clearly applied only to post-sentencing hearings. Order of the superior court affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Pownall

    Publication Date: 2022-08-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22-0856

    Commonwealth's interlocutory appeal from denial of motion to preclude standard jury instructions was properly quashed where asserted handicap to prosecution was based upon speculation and hypotheticals since the evidentiary record had not been set. Order of the superior court affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. Young

    Publication Date: 2022-01-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22-0013

    Although failure to file separate notices of appeal at each docket number meant that an appeal was not perfected, Pa.R.A.P. allowed appellate courts to exercise discretion to remand the case to allow the appellant to correct its error. Order of the superior court reversed and remanded.

  • In the Interest of J.J.M.

    Publication Date: 2022-01-10
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law
    Industry: Education | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22-0004

    Superior court erred in upholding appellant's adjudication of delinquency for making terroristic threats under §2706(a)(3) because neither of appellant's statements were true threats, he did not utter them with conscious disregard of the risk of causing terror and they did not cross the constitutional threshold from protected speech. Reversed.

  • Commonwealth v. Dunkins

    Publication Date: 2021-12-06
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 21-1404

    The trial court did not err in refusing to suppress cell site location information gathered by college officials while investigating an on-campus robbery where defendant voluntarily abandoned any purported expectation of privacy in such records by assenting to the college's computing resources policy and logging on to the college WiFi network with his cell phone. The high court affirmed.

  • Pascal v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

    Publication Date: 2021-10-11
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 21-1177

    Objectors were not required to show that decision-maker with actual conflict of interest had bias or influence over the decisions of others, as the mere appearance of a lack of neutrality was sufficient to require recusal. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.

  • Commonwealth v. Jordan

    Publication Date: 2021-09-06
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Dougherty
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 21-1018

    Inconsistent verdicts from simultaneous jury and bench trials did not run afoul of double jeopardy protections where a defendant was being subjected to only one prosecution and inconsistent verdicts were generally permissible. Judgment of the superior court affirmed.