• Commonwealth v. Adams

    Publication Date: 2019-02-05
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0120

    Pursuant to the fugitive forfeiture rule as applied in Commonwealth v. Deemer, the appellate court correctly affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence after the trial court found that he forfeited his appellate rights due to his fugitive status, even where counsel filed a timely notice of appeal on his behalf. The high court affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence.

  • Snyder Bros. Inc. v. PUC

    Publication Date: 2019-01-15
    Practice Area: Energy and Natural Resources | Fee Disputes
    Industry: Energy | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0001

    The commonwealth court erred in its interpretation of "vertical gas well" under act 13 and the court held that an unconventional well was a vertical gas well subject to assessment of an impact fee whenever that well's production exceeded 90,000 cubic feet per day in at least one calendar month of the year. Reversed.

  • In re: Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury

    Publication Date: 2018-12-18
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Privacy
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-1532

    Redaction of information from grand jury report that tended to impair reputational rights of individuals named in report but not criminally charged was best available due process remedy, where re-empaneling grand jury and/or directing supervising judge to review new exculpatory and rebuttal evidence was not statutorily authorized. Order of the court affirmed.

  • Washington v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare

    Publication Date: 2018-08-07
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Constitutional Law | Government
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0922

    Legislature violated Art. III, §4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution where it passed a bill whose contents were completely gutted and replaced without then considering the bill on three separate days in each chamber. Order of the commonwealth court reversed.

  • In the Interest of J.B.

    Publication Date: 2018-08-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0928

    Superior Court erred in affirming juvenile's adjudication as delinquent for the murder of his stepmother because the evidence was, at best, in equipoise and was insufficient as a matter of law to overcome the presumption of innocence. Reversed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Delaware County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • League of Women Voters of Pa. v. Commonwealth

    Publication Date: 2018-02-20
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Election and Political Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0174

    Free and Equal Elections Clause of Pennsylvania Constitution required that representative districts be compact and contiguous, without breaking up counties and municipalities, and of roughly equal population, which best ensured that each voter in every community had an equally effective opportunity to select representatives of his or her choice. Order of the commonwealth court reversed.

  • Commonwealth v. VanDivner

    Publication Date: 2018-02-20
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0169

    Death sentence vacated where appellant presented sufficient evidence at pretrial hearing to support finding that he was intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for death penalty. Judgment of sentence of death vacated, life sentence imposed.

  • Shearer v. Hafer

    Publication Date: 2018-02-13
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Expert Witnesses | Motor Vehicle Torts
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0077

    Superior court erred in considering appellants appeal of the trial court order disallowing the presence of appellants counsel during the standardized portion of a neuropsychological examination because the order was not an appealable order as of right under Pa.R.A.P. 313 where the order met only one of the three prongs of the collateral order doctrine. Vacated.

  • Shearer v. Hafer

    Publication Date: 2018-02-06
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Personal Injury
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0077

    Superior court erred in considering appellants appeal of the trial court order disallowing the presence of appellants counsel during the standardized portion of a neuropsychological examination because the order was not an appealable order as of right under Pa.R.A.P. 313 where the order met only one of the three prongs of the collateral order doctrine. Vacated.

  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pozonsky

    Publication Date: 2018-02-06
    Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0112

    Respondent judge was disbarred after he resigned his judicial commission and was convicted for stealing cocaine from the evidence locker in his courtroom and using it for recreational purposes while the founder and sitting judge of the drug court, obstructing administration of law and misapplication of entrusted property because respondents grievous conduct far outweighed the mitigation evidence he offered, it severely diminished the publics confidence in the judiciary and respondent offered no causal connection between his addictio