Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
562 results for '* topic:"Family Law"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas
Judge: Judge Acker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 74 OF 2018, D.P.
The court denied petitioner's request for the involuntary termination of parental rights on the grounds that the agency failed to demonstrate clear and convincing evidence that the requirements of 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 2511(a)(5) and 2511(8) of the Adoption Act were satisfied.
Publication Date: 2023-03-27
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Sullivan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2347 EDA 2022
Trial court erred in finding it had subject matter jurisdiction over child custody matter where neither mother, father nor child had resided in Pennsylvania since April 2019 and trial court also erred in holding that father's 2018 petition was unresolved because the unresolved petition at the time of the hearing was father's 2020 petition. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2023-03-27
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Tira
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2022-6821
The court terminated mother and father's parental rights, finding that clear and convincing evidence existed under 23 Pa.C.S. §2511(a)(1), (2), (5), and (8) due to the parents' relinquishment of parental duties, failure to make progress in the court-ordered plans, and failure to remedy their incapacities.
Publication Date: 2023-03-27
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Tira
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2022-6820
The court terminated mother and father's parental rights, finding that clear and convincing evidence existed under 23 Pa.C.S. §2511(a)(1), (2), (5), and (8) due to the parents' relinquishment of parental duties, failure to make progress in the court-ordered plans, and failure to remedy their incapacities.
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Higgins
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 6155-CV-2020
The court denied a parent's motion to relocate her minor child on the basis that the move was not in the best interest of the minor as outlined in 23 Pa.C.S.A. §5328(a) and that relocation factors as outlined in 23 Pa.C.S.A. §5337 (h) weighed in favor of denying the motion.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Olson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 725 WDA 2022
Mother appealed parts of child custody order finding her in contempt for baptizing child without telling father despite father's known opposition, ordering co-parent counseling to purge the contempt and restricting child's use of "dad" to her biological parent and court found trial court properly found mother in contempt, erred in imposing the purge condition and violated child's first amendment rights in the language restriction. Affirmed in part, vacated in part.
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Carbon County
Judge: Judge Serfass
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-9060
An incarcerated father's merely passive interest in his minor son supported termination of parental rights where the son had since developed a strong and healthy bond with nurturing foster parents. The trial court recommended that its final decree terminating parental rights be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Carbon County
Judge: Judge Serfass
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-9061
The court recommended that appellant biological father's appeal of the termination of his parental rights be affirmed on the basis that appellant failed to perform parental duties under §2511(a)(11) while incarcerated and further failed to take advantage of any parental programs while incarcerated.
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1753 MDA 2022
Trial court erred in granting hospital authorization to terminate child's life support in the event of a confirmatory second brain death evaluation, where trial court precluded child's father from questioning medical personnel about the termination of life support or options in the event of a confirmatory second exam. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 12035 of 2009, C.A.
Evidence of record compelled the trial court's transfer of primary physical custody of minor children from mother to father. The trial court properly relied upon the children's testimony from a conciliation conference to support its rationale regarding the custody arrangement which most suited the children's best interests. The court recommended that the Superior Court affirm its custody order and dismiss mother's appeal.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read