Filter This View

  • Cook v. Cook

    Publication Date: 2018-05-22
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Shogan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0608

    Denial of permanent alimony properly denied where wife filed incredible monthly budget that exceeded her monthly income and husband credibly testified as to the parties' standard of living during the marriage. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and denied in part.

  • Fotopoulos v. Fotopoulos

    Publication Date: 2018-05-15
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Bowes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0576

    Trial courts preliminary order and decree permitting entry of the divorce decree were proper because husbands challenge to the telephonic testimony of wifes medical expert at the masters hearing failed. Affirmed

  • P.J.P. v. M.M.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-15
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McLaughlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0568

    Petition to modify custody properly denied where court found maintenance of mothers primary physical custody warranted where she fostered the childs relationship with father and where the parties had a high-conflict relationship that would make shared physical custody untenable. Order of the trial court affirmed.

  • Ealey v. Sharp

    Publication Date: 2018-05-08
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Higgins
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0493

    In this custody modification proceeding, the court concluded shared physical custody was in the childs best interest.

  • In re: Adoption of T.M.L.M.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-01
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Strassburger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0416

    The minor child in this case involving the potential involuntary termination of his mothers parental rights was deprived of his right to counsel where assigned counsel only expressed concern for the childs best interests but did not address the childs preferred outcome. The appellate court vacated and remanded.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Connecticut Business Litigation, 4th Edition

    Authors: THOMAS J. FINN, PAULA CRUZ CEDILLO

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • C.S. v. Dept. of Human Servs.

    Publication Date: 2018-04-24
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge McCullough
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0475

    Use of confidential child abuse expungement proceeding testimony in subsequent licensure disciplinary proceeding warranted under due process grounds preliminary objections of the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals overruled.

  • Olmeda v. Pachuilo

    Publication Date: 2018-04-24
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Berks County
    Judge: Judge Lash
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0438

    Mother was entitled to primary physical custody of the parties minor children where 50-50 custody arrangement was not viable due to the childrens school commute and mother was more nurturing and attentive, while father was ambivalent to the childrens needs and sometimes abusive. The court ordered shared legal custody, with mother to have primary physical custody.

  • Schultz v. Schultz

    Publication Date: 2018-04-24
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0486

    Trial courts equitable distribution order and denial of alimony in the dissolution of a long term marriage was proper because the trial court considered the appropriate factors, including accepting parties stipulation as to the ownership of artworks. Affirmed.

  • Reed v. Walker

    Publication Date: 2018-04-24
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Berks County
    Judge: Judge Lash
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0440

    The court properly quashed a subpoena to the opposing partys attorney and imposed sanctions on the attorney who issued the subpoena. Any information possessed by opposing counsel was covered by the attorney-client privilege or was inadmissible hearsay obtained from third parties.

  • K.S. v. Bruno

    Publication Date: 2018-04-17
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
    Judge: District Judge Kane
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 18-0454

    Medical defendants were entitled to have the fourth amendment and procedural and substantive due process complaints against them, based on their finding that child had been abused, dismissed because the complaint did not offer any reasonable support to show that defendants lacked reasonable and articulable evidence of abuse or consciously disregarded a great risk that no abuse had occurred and there was no evidence that they engaged in any joint activity with the police that led to the arrest of mothers boyfriend. Motion granted.