Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-05-24
Practice Area: Evidence
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Dougherty
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 31 EAP 2022
Inadmissible hearsay evidence alone was insufficient to satisfy the commonwealth's burden to prove a prima facie case as to a defendant's identity at a preliminary hearing. Order of the superior court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-05-24
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Energy | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Carlucci
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV2023-01192
Appellants, a solar project developer and local citizens who opposed the project, appealed appellee township's grant of appellant developer's application for a zoning ordinance special exception for construction of a solar energy system. The court concluded that appellant developer was entitled to a "deemed" approval where appellee's written decision on its application was rendered more than 45 days after appellee's hearing on the application. The court concluded further that the deemed approval meant the court would conduct de novo r
Publication Date: 2024-05-23
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Jordan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3418
Appellant Freedom Mortgage Corporation appealed the district court's order affirming the Bankruptcy Court's order that confirmed debtor Tiffany Smith's third modified Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan.
Publication Date: 2024-05-22
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1617
Frederick and Marta Jo Stampone filed a lawsuit against 35 individuals and entities, alleging claims such as conspiracy, kidnapping, elder abuse, and constitutional violations arising from Marta Jo's conservatorship and medical care.
Publication Date: 2024-05-20
Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-3114
Appellant filed a complaint against the Department of Housing and several individuals, alleging interference with safe housing and various other grievances, including stalking, harassment, and identity theft.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: KOSKOFF KOSKOFF, BIEDER PC, CAREY B. REILLY
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-05-20
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-3039
Appellant initiated a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Roberts
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1159 CD 2023
In a §1925(a) opinion, the court asked the Commonwealth Court to affirm its order denying appellant's emergency application for a writ of execution on an arbitration award that was entered at least two and a half years prior to the filing of the application.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Carlucci
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV-23-00074
The court granted plaintiff's motion to compel deposition testimony by defendant in a dispute over a property settlement agreement.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Murphy
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-4042
Employee asserted prima facie failure to accommodate claim where there was evidence that employer's proposed accommodations were inadequate to address employee's documented health concerns. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment denied, defendant's motion for summary judgment denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 135 C.D. 2020
Trial court erred in denying nunc pro tunc relief to appellants in their challenge to their 2019 property assessment because Board of Revision of Taxes was negligent in not mailing appellants notice of the reassessment and appellants filed an appeal with BRT as soon as they received their 2019 tax bill, which was the first time they received notice that their property had been reassessed. Reversed.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read