• Commonwealth v. Thompson

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Kunselman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1432 WDA 2022

    Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence entered on his conviction for homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence and other crimes. The court affirmed, holding that appellant suffered no violation of his Confrontation Clause rights where the trial court accepted evidence of the vehicles' event data recorder information as extracted and analyzed by a responding police officer who testified as a Commonwealth expert in accident reconstruction.

  • Saber v. Navy Fed. Credit Union

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Coyle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00635

    Appellant filed a notice of appeal of the court's order denying his motion for title of vehicle. The court requested that the appeal be dismissed for appellant's failure to file a concise statement of matters complained of on appeal.

  • Commonwealth v. Williams

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2725 EDA 2022

    Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence on his non-jury trial conviction for criminal contempt. The court affirmed, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support appellant's conviction where he admittedly made a "gun" gesture at a testifying witness upon entering the courtroom, even where the gesture was not seen by the witness or the trial court.

  • Johnson v. Omni Prop. Serv. Mgmt., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Pratter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-4539

    Plaintiff failed to present evidence contradicting defendants' payroll records demonstrating that defendants employed fewer than 15 workers, requiring dismissal of plaintiff's Title VII claim. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.

  • Bernard v. Ignelzi

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Judges
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Stickman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2:23-cv-1463

    Plaintiffs sued two judges for alleged violations of their constitutional rights in a landlord-tenant case over which defendant judges presided. The court granted judicial defendants' motion to dismiss on the basis of absolute judicial immunity where the judges had jurisdiction over ongoing post-judgment discovery matters while plaintiffs' sought appellate review.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Leveraged Buyouts

    Authors: Joseph W. Bartlett, Peter L. Korn, Jr., David J. Mittelstadt, Cathy L. Reese, Michael A. Rueda

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • City of Lancaster v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Public Utilities
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Brobson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 107 MAP 2022

    Public Utility Commission regulations concerning the placement of gas meters in historic districts did not constitute unconstitutional delegation of legislative/regulatory authority to public utilities where the legislature had never passed a law mandating the placement of meters, which had traditionally been left to the discretion of the utilities. Order of the commonwealth court reversed, case remanded.

  • Commonwealth v. Harris

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3080 EDA 2022

    Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order decertifying appellee's case and transferring it to the Juvenile Division as a delinquency matter. The court vacated the decertification order where the trial court failed to consider multiple criteria that it was required to evaluate before granting decertification.

  • Wintrust Specialty Fin. v. He

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
    Judge: Judge Mellon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2020-06722

    Plaintiff appealed the court's verdict in favor of defendant in its debt collection action involving commercially leased vehicles. The court concluded that it did not err in entering its verdict in favor of defendant where plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it was the real party in interest as assignee of defendant's commercial vehicle lease, his associated personal guaranty, or title to the leased vehicles in question.

  • United States v. Araiza-Vega

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Hardy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-218-14

    Court granted motion for sentence reduction where an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines reduced defendant's Guidelines range, and his lack of criminal history, strong work history, and post-sentencing rehabilitative efforts weighed in favor of a reduction. Defendant's motion for sentence reduction granted.

  • SpiriTrust Lutheran v. Wagman Constr., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Construction | Real Estate
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 572 MDA 2022

    Trial court erred in dismissing contract claims on statute of limitations grounds where there were genuine issues of material fact concerning the terms of the parties' contract and whether it contained a statute of limitations/substantial compliance provision that would bar appellant from invoking the discovery exception. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.