Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
District court erred in holding appellant did not qualify for relief under Rehaif v. U.S., 139 S.Ct. 2191, because his 2019 28 U.S.C. §2255 motion was second or successive since Rehaif announced a new rule that was substantive and retroactive. Vacated and remanded.
Defendant appealed the court's order denying his appeal of the denial of his petition to open a municipal court's entry of default judgment in a landlord-tenant action. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where defendant offered no justifiable excuse for failing to appear at the municipal court's scheduled hearing on plaintiff's landlord-tenant complaint.
Appellant moved to set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255 and court found his attempted bank robbery counts could take place without violence and his sentence predicated on his attempted armed bank robberies had to be vacated. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2024-05-03 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stevens Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 1430 MDA 2023
Appellant appealed the trial court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. The court affirmed, holding that appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel where his trial attorney recommended that he accept a favorable plea deal immediately before trial instead of pursuing a speedy trial motion that was unlikely to succeed in light of an adverse judicial ruling that Rule 600 computations were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The court recommended affirmance of its preliminary injunctive order against the City of Philadelphia enjoining it from interfering with or causing interruption in the business of plaintiff's drinking establishment.
Publication Date: 2024-05-03 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Olson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 1315 MDA 2023
Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence, which imposed a "no alcohol" probation condition at the conclusion of probation revocation proceedings. The court held that the trial court acted within its discretion in imposing a "no alcohol" condition on appellant's probation after appellant relied on alcohol to commit probation violations.
Publication Date: 2024-05-03 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Colins Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 1103 EDA 2023
Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence on her bench trial conviction for driving under the combined influence of alcohol and a drug or drug combination. The court vacated appellant's conviction, holding that evidence was insufficient to support appellant's conviction where a police officer merely saw a "wet" cigarette in appellant's vehicle during an encounter in an area known for drug trafficking.
Court declined to impose a definite temporal threshold to evidence supporting a Monell claim arising from police misconduct. Defendant's motions in limine denied in part and granted in part.
Court denied motion to withdraw reference to bankruptcy court where non-core claims were intertwined with the core bankruptcy claims and transfer to district court would not foster judicial economy. Motion to withdraw reference denied.