Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
456 results for '* topic:"Employment Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-15
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Weintraub
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2022-06839
In this §1925(a) opinion, the trial court defended its order sustaining the preliminary objections of appellee Ashfield Healthcare and dismissing appellant's wrongful termination claim with prejudice.
Publication Date: 2024-11-08
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pappert
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-4445
Defendant sought sanctions based upon the litigation conduct of plaintiff's counsel. The court granted the motion, imposing monetary sanctions against plaintiff's counsel based upon the expenses and attorney fees incurred by defendant as a result of plaintiff's counsel's violations of the court's orders.
Publication Date: 2024-10-25
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Jubelirer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1063 C.D. 2023
The court affirmed the order of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas that concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant's petition for review of the determination of his retirement benefits when the police union's collective bargaining agreement with the City was the exclusive method of challenging his retirement benefit. It found appellant had standing to grieve his pension benefits under the CBA, and erroneously petitioned the trial court for an appeal rather than engage in the CBA's grievance and arbitrat
Publication Date: 2024-10-25
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Leavitt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 900 C.D. 2023
The court affirmed the determination of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying claimant's application for unemployment benefits because she voluntarily terminated her employment without a necessitous and compelling cause.
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Hey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-2533
The court found that plaintiff's claims of a change in her work schedule and denial of days off did not constitute tangible employment actions and plaintiff's claims of being denied a supervisory position and the opportunity to pursue employment with an outside vendor were too speculative to survive, however found that plaintiff stated a plausible quid pro quo harassment claim based on allegations that her supervisor thwarted her transfer or promotion to the company's corporate headquarters.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-10-16
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-2601
Kaeun Kim, acting pro se, petitioned for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the disclosure of a surveillance video, impose sanctions against Prudential Financial, Inc., and stay his criminal proceedings in New Jersey state court.
Publication Date: 2024-10-01
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Montgomery-Reeves
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Margherita A. Capolino, Caroline English, Pascal F. Naples, ArentFox Schiff, Washington, DC; Elizabeth Hopkins, Susan L. Meter, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA; Teresa Renaker, Kristen G. Scott, Renaker Scott, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Curtis J. Crowther, Robinson & Cole, Wilmington, DE; Linda L. Morkan, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, CT; Timothy J. Snyder, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE; Melissa D. Hill, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, New York, NY; Brian M. Killian, James D. Nelson, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Washington, DC; Russell L. Hirschhorn, Proskauer Rose, New York, NY; John E. Roberts, Proskauer Rose, Boston, MA; Jennifer C. Wasson, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE; Anthony F. Shelley, Theresa S. Gee, Miller & Chevalier, Washington, DC; C. Scott Reese, Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: 23-1499
Family trust established to pay pensions to domestic employees was not subject to ERISA coverage where it could not qualify as a multiple-employer plan due to the lack of necessary connection between the family members and the family members' lack of involvement in managing the trust.
Publication Date: 2024-09-27
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:23-cv-01810-JDW
Defendant employer sought summary judgment on plaintiffs' claims of race, color and gender discrimination and retaliation. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, holding that plaintiffs failed to present a prima facie claim of discrimination where they suffered under a difficult boss but offered no evidence that they were treated poorly on the basis of their race or sex. The court held further that plaintiffs presented viable claims for retaliation where evidence showed that defendant revoked its offer to transfer
Publication Date: 2024-09-27
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Cercone
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:21cv553
Defendant moved for sanctions and plaintiff filed an "emergency" motion to extend in plaintiff's action alleging discrimination on the basis of race, hostile work environment and retaliation and court dismissed plaintiff's complaint as a sanction for plaintiff's failure to respond to discovery requests and continually filing "emergency" motions to extend the deadline to retain new counsel where over 500 days had passed since court granted plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw from the case and plaintiff had failed to respond to dis
Publication Date: 2024-09-13
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Education
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Lane
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1909 EDA 2023
Former employee's breach of contract claims failed where employee handbook expressly stated that employment was at will; however, trial court erred in sustaining preliminary objections to defamation claim against former supervisor where his statements were capable of being proven true or false and understood to have a defamatory meaning. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read