Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
559 results for '* topic:"Family Law"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-15
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2023DR00596
Appellant father appealed the court's order imposing a monthly child support obligation in favor of appellee mother. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed, holding in part that evidence of father's income and lifestyle supported a net monthly income calculation well above the annual salary figure quoted by father.
Publication Date: 2024-11-15
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2018DR01877
Father appealed the court's child support order imposing a support obligation. The court recommended that its order, premised upon a wage rate of $15 per hour for 40 hours per week, be affirmed where father remained unemployed after being incarcerated due solely to his failure to explore all of his employment options.
Publication Date: 2024-11-01
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Gardner
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-20425
Plaintiff petitioned for an interpretation of the phrase "financial net worth" as found in her prenuptial agreement with defendant. The court concluded that in the context of the parties' prenuptial agreement the phrase "financial net worth" meant the value of the parties' financial accounts and did not include defendant's real estate holdings and pension.
Publication Date: 2024-11-01
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stevens
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1295 MDA 2023
Appellant father appealed the trial court's denial of his petition to hold mother in contempt for failure to comply with the parties' consent agreement in proceedings initiated by mother under the Protection from Abuse Act. The court vacated and remanded for further proceedings, holding that the trial court had authority to hold mother in contempt to enforce a PFA order based on the parties' consent agreement.
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Lazarus
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1080 EDA 2024
Court vacated decrees involuntarily terminating parental rights where trial court wholesale adopted Office of Children, Youth and Families' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law without any independent analysis justifying the trial court's decision. Orders of trial court remanded.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-10-18
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Cannon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 728 C.D. 2023
Administrative proceeding's failure to issue adjudication within statutory 45-day window did not constitute violation of petitioner's procedural due process rights where there was no prejudice to petitioner's rights or reputation from the delay.
Publication Date: 2024-10-11
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Acker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20041 of 2023, O.C.-A.
Petitioner sought involuntary termination of parental rights of respondent natural parents in a dependency action. The court granted the petition, holding that involuntary termination of parental rights was warranted where petitioner offered evidence of, and the record demonstrated, mother's and father's lack of interest regarding their minor child, their noncompliance with permanency plans, their failure to attend drug screening, and their failure to attend dependency action hearings.
Publication Date: 2024-10-11
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 104 OF 2020, D.R.
Defendant found in contempt for failure to pay court-ordered support payments and court ordered probation, payment of a fine and a purge payment.
Publication Date: 2024-10-11
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Acker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10101 OF 2021, C.A.
The trial court issued its ruling on May 9, 2024, following a hearing on the parties' exceptions to the master's recommendation of Dec. 12, 2022, on the equitable distribution and economic claims in the parties' divorce. The court found a 2020 tax refund to be marital property. IRS-issued stimulus checks received by defendant based on a formula determined by Congress after the separation were not marital property. The court found that a check from Verizon for damage done to the marital residence during the marriage was marital proper
Publication Date: 2024-10-11
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Murray
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 211 WDA 2024
Trial court correctly determined that grounds for divorce had not been established before spouse's death where spouse died less than 20 days after filing an affidavit establishing grounds for divorce and the other spouse did not affirmatively admit the allegations in the affidavit. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read