Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
21 results for '* topic:"Wage and Hour Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-10-11
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Accounting | Call Centers
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge King
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 510 EDA 2022
The court affirmed the trial court's order that an employee could bring an action for liquidated damages under the Wage Payment and Collection Law, 42 Pa. C.S. §§ 260.1-260.45, regardless of whether the employer has paid all outstanding wages by the time legal action commenced.
Publication Date: 2024-09-20
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Automotive | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-01447
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) in a putative class action involving alleged overtime violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Missouri Minimum Wage Laws.
Publication Date: 2024-09-13
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Bartle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2854
Plaintiffs moved for approval of a negotiated Fair Labor Standards Act settlement of their collective action against their employer. The court granted the motion, holding that the proposed FLSA settlement of plaintiffs' overtime wage claims for day-rate compensation was fair and reasonable and that the proposed awards of attorneys' fees and service awards for the originating plaintiffs were appropriate in their entirety.
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Cercone
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:22cv1367
Plaintiff moved to compel discovery in its a class action under the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act and the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law and court found the allegations forming the substance of plaintiff's wage and hour violations were not limited to distinct activities performed by field supervisors, defendant did not explain how the request imposed an undue burden, defendant did not provide a sufficiently detailed privilege log for those documents which it declined to produce and pre-certification discovery of the name
Publication Date: 2023-12-04
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Padilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2541
Plaintiffs moved for certification of their wages and hours suit as a class action. The court granted the motion where class plaintiffs sought to represent the claims of up to 400 adult strip club entertainers employed by defendant.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Ceisler
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 689 C.D. 2022
Petitioner sought review of respondent's final agency decision denying its grievance under the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act. The court affirmed where the historical and general renovation phases of petitioner's building rehabilitation project were intertwined for purposes of the PWA, and thus all work performed on the project was subject to the Act.
Publication Date: 2023-08-07
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pappert
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-cv-3881-GJP
Plaintiffs who owned and operated individual product distribution territories were independent contractors rather than employees of defendant food manufacturer. The court therefore granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs' putative class action claim alleging violations of Pennsylvania's Wage Payment and Collection Law.
Publication Date: 2023-07-03
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Legal Services | Retail | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Marston
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-2642-KSM
Court denied motion for sanctions against plaintiffs' counsel for opposing arbitration despite express arbitration agreement where counsel's conduct did not rise to the level of bad faith or intentional misconduct but merely represented misapprehension of the law and resulting zealous advocacy based on that misinterpretation. Defendants' motion for sanctions denied.
Publication Date: 2023-05-29
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Pellegrini
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 510 EDA 2022
Plaintiff and defendant cross-appealed trial court's order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and granting plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment. The court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-10-30
Practice Area: Attorney Rates and Arrangements | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Strassburger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-1298
Trial court did not err in awarding past due salary and liquidated damages under the WPCL to attorney who had an agreement with law firm for a salary which firm failed to pay because despite firm's allegation that attorney violated his duties of loyalty, diligence, good faith and promptness, attorney's days out of the office did not impact firm's revenue, there was no policy prohibiting working from home and firm's attempt to renegotiate the terms of plaintiff's contract belied the claim that firm believed he had constructively termin
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read