DOL Sues Google Over Failure to Provide Compensation Data
The U.S. Department of Labor announced on Wednesday that it has filed a complaint against Google Inc., claiming the company did not allow its Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs access to Google's employee compensation records as part of a compliance review, in violation of federal antidiscrimination law.
January 04, 2017 at 09:05 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Jason Doiy
The DOL is asking an administrative law judge to order the company to turn over information on job and salary history for employees including starting salary, starting position, starting job level and other “snapshot” information from Sept. 1 2014 and Sept. 2015 along with names and contact information for employees.
The department said that “unless restrained by an administrative order, Google will continue to violate its obligations.” It requested that the administrative law judge compel Google to comply, or else issue an order cancelling the company's contracts and subcontracts and barring the company from entering into future contracts.
In response to the claims, Google said in an emailed statement that it did not reveal the data because of the belief that requests were too broad, and asked for confidential information.
The Department of Labor did not immediately provide comment on the suit, but in a statement, OFCCP Acting Director Thomas M. Dowd said that Google had “many opportunities” to produce pay data voluntarily. “We filed this lawsuit so we can obtain the information we need to complete our evaluation,” he said.
In an emailed statement provided by a spokesperson, Google said it has “worked hard to comply” with the compliance program office's current audit and provided “hundreds of thousands of records” in the last year.
“However, the handful of OFCCP requests that are the subject of the complaint are overbroad in scope, or reveal confidential data, and we've made this clear to the OFCCP, to no avail,” the statement said. “These requests include thousands of employees' private contact information which we safeguard rigorously.”
The labor department complaint comes amid heightened scrutiny of Silicon Valley employment practices. In recent years, some high-tech corporations have been criticized for employing disproportionately low numbers of African-Americans, Latinos and women. In September 2016, the labor department filed a lawsuit against Palantir Technologies, for example, accusing the company of systematically discriminating against Asian job applicants.
The Labor Department's federal contract office informed Google in September 2015 that it had chosen the company's Mountain View, California headquarters for a random audit, which the tech giant refused, according to the complaint. The office asked for job and salary history from employees, under Executive Order 11246, which outlaws pay discrimination for federal contractors and requires them to permit the Labor Department to examine its books and records for compliance.
The complaint also cited the Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act and the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibit contractors from discriminating against veterans and the disabled, respectively.
Two Jackson Lewis partners, Matthew Camardella and Daniel Duff III confirmed that they are representing Google in the matter.
Read more:
Assault on Wage Gap Forcing Industry to Pay More Than Lip Service
Employment Lawyers Blame Society, Not Employers, for Pay Inequity
States Look to Give Teeth to National Pay Equity Legislation
Contact Rebekah Mintzer at [email protected]. On Twitter: @rmintzer
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute read
California’s Workplace Violence Laws: Protecting Victims’ Rights in the Workplace
6 minute read
Employers Scramble to Get Immigration Records in Order Ahead of Trump Crackdown
6 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
