February Bar Exam by the Numbers: How Schools Fared
Newly released figures for California's February bar exam show a wide disparity in pass rates among American Bar Association-accredited law schools.
May 31, 2017 at 03:52 PM
5 minute read
SACRAMENTO—Newly released figures for California's February bar exam show a wide disparity in pass rates among American Bar Association-accredited law schools.
Sixty-five percent of test-takers from Loyola and UCLA law schools passed the exam, according to documents released Wednesday by the state bar. That's the highest rate for any school where at least 11 graduates took the test. The state bar does not disclose figures for schools with fewer test-takers to help shield their identities.
At the ABA-approved University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law, just 32 percent of the 81 graduates—about 25 students—who took the February exam received passing scores. That's below the test's overall pass rate of 34.5 percent and lower than the success rates of graduates from two non-ABA-accredited schools, San Joaquin College of Law (36 percent) and Santa Barbara College of Law (40 percent).
Scores on the February exam typically run lower than those on the July exam because of the higher number of repeat test-takers in the spring. First-time test-takers traditionally fare better.
The range of success by school and relatively low pass rates on the February test will add to the debate over California's exam, which is now under scrutiny by law school deans, lawmakers and state bar officials.
“It's the right direction to be going in,” said UC Hastings Dean David Faigman, whose graduates beat the average success rate with 48 percent earning a passing score. After the school's students logged disappointing scores on the July 2016 test, Hastings paid for exam preparation programs for graduates and linked test-takers with alumni for additional help.The school is building more bar exam prep work into the curriculum for current students, a move Faigman has mixed feelings about.
“It presents the danger of taking time away from teaching students how to be good lawyers so they can be better test-takers,” he said.
Faigman and other deans are pressing state bar leaders to study the exam's validity and to lower the pass score in the meantime. The state Supreme Court has refused to temporarily lower the score, although justices asked the bar to return with recommendations for possible changes by the end of the year. Bar officials are currently conducting several studies on the exam.
Related Articles:
|- Calif. Bar Exam Pass-Rate Slides Again, Falling Below 35 Percent
- By the Numbers: How California Law Schools Fared on the Bar Exam
- How Out-of-State Schools Fared on California Bar Exam
- Calif. Supreme Court Won't Lower Bar-Pass Score—For Now
- Frustrated Law Deans Take Bar-Exam Complaints to Lawmakers
SACRAMENTO—Newly released figures for California's February bar exam show a wide disparity in pass rates among American Bar Association-accredited law schools.
Sixty-five percent of test-takers from Loyola and UCLA law schools passed the exam, according to documents released Wednesday by the state bar. That's the highest rate for any school where at least 11 graduates took the test. The state bar does not disclose figures for schools with fewer test-takers to help shield their identities.
At the ABA-approved University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law, just 32 percent of the 81 graduates—about 25 students—who took the February exam received passing scores. That's below the test's overall pass rate of 34.5 percent and lower than the success rates of graduates from two non-ABA-accredited schools,
Scores on the February exam typically run lower than those on the July exam because of the higher number of repeat test-takers in the spring. First-time test-takers traditionally fare better.
The range of success by school and relatively low pass rates on the February test will add to the debate over California's exam, which is now under scrutiny by law school deans, lawmakers and state bar officials.
“It's the right direction to be going in,” said UC Hastings Dean David Faigman, whose graduates beat the average success rate with 48 percent earning a passing score. After the school's students logged disappointing scores on the July 2016 test, Hastings paid for exam preparation programs for graduates and linked test-takers with alumni for additional help.The school is building more bar exam prep work into the curriculum for current students, a move Faigman has mixed feelings about.
“It presents the danger of taking time away from teaching students how to be good lawyers so they can be better test-takers,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuild It and They Will Come: Tips to Market Your Practice as a Junior Attorney
6 minute readThe 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute readEx-eBay CLO Tells WIPL Attendees: You Can Toot Your Own Horn and 'Still Be a Humble Person'
Trending Stories
- 1Pharma Company Faces Breach-of-Contract Claim Over $1.3 Million in Unpaid Invoices
- 2KPMG Law Seeks Alternative Business License, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
- 3Pittsburgh's Reed Smith, K&L Gates Join Fight to Save Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel Merger
- 4Milbank, Wachtell, Ropes and Pittsburgh Duo Aim to Save Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel Merger
- 5A Top Connecticut Lawyer Has Resigned
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250