California Says Goodbye to Eric Holder Contract (Sort Of)
California's Assembly on Thursday ended its contract with Covington & Burling for guidance on fighting Trump administration policies—even as the state Senate pledged to continue working with the firm.
June 01, 2017 at 06:55 PM
3 minute read
SACRAMENTO—California's Assembly on Thursday ended its contract with Covington & Burling for guidance on fighting Trump administration policies—even as the state Senate pledged to continue working with the firm.
Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Paramount, said lawmakers had received “valuable guidance” since leaders first signed the $25,000-a-month legal services agreement in January. He offered no explanation for dropping the Covington team led by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr.
“We will continue to seek their guidance as the need arises,” Rendon said.
Dan Reeves, chief of staff to Senate leader Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, said in an email that Covington's counsel had been “very valuable … in responding to the Trump administration's sustained attack on California's policies and values.”
“We currently have a number of ongoing projects with Covington and plan to continue that valuable relationship,” Reeves said. He did not respond to questions about what those projects are and who would pay for firm's work going forward.
A spokesman for Covington & Burling did not return a message on Thursday.
State Democrats, with large majorities in both houses, touted the contract in early January as the first step in building a firewall against any attack by President Donald Trump's on California's immigration, environment and health care policies. The state was on the verge then of losing its attorney general, Kamala Harris, who was elected to the U.S. Senate, and both Rendon and de Leon said California needed legal assistance on federal issues.
State Republicans derided the hiring of the Covington team, arguing that Democrats should rely instead on career attorneys in the Attorney General's Office and in the Legislature.
Since February, Covington's services—capped at 40 hours a month—have not produced much visible work. Holder briefly appeared with legislative leaders in Sacramento on Feb. 7 for meetings and a photo opportunity. In April, the firm sent a letter on behalf of the Legislature to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, challenging their allegations that the state is hampering enforcement of federal immigration laws.
On Thursday, Assembly Republicans posted a snarky tweet of a blank list of Covington accomplishments, suggesting California taxpayers haven't gotten their money's worth.
“This was an unjustifiable contract of dubious legality,” said Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, R-Roseville. “The responsible parties should refund California taxpayers the $100,000 they paid for it.”
Kiley has asked Attorney General Xavier Becerra for a legal opinion on whether the Legislature had the authority to hire Covington. An aide to the assemblyman said Thursday he has not received a response.
Senior legislative staff disputed Republican accusations that the Covington contract had not been fruitful. The firm's lawyers offered guidance on understanding and responding to Trump's executive orders, including laws affecting so-called sanctuary cities, as well as the president's moves targeting climate change, federal energy policy and the Affordable Care Act.
Copyright The Recorder. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Related Articles:
|- California's Anti-Trump Strategy, Featuring Eric Holder, Will Cost $25K Monthly
- California Extends Anti-Trump Contract With Covington
- California's Covington Team Calls Trump Immigration Claims 'Unsupported'
- Covington, California Mum on Next Steps After Trump-Focused Contract Ends
- Budget Would Give Becerra 19 New Lawyers to Fight Trump
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look at Big Law Partner Donors to Trump and Harris in California
Big Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readRussia-Linked Deepfakes Are Hitting the US Election. Will It Spur Congress to Act?
Trending Stories
- 1Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 2DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
- 3Environmental Law in Trump’s Second Term
- 4Lock-Maker's Veteran GC Takes Old Job Back After Successor Lasts Just 3 Months
- 5Judge Sets April Retrial Date in Sarah Palin Defamation Action Against NY Times
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250