Contra Costa DA, Latest Prosecutor Facing Scrutiny, Quits After Perjury Plea
Contra Costa County District Attorney Mark Peterson resigned from office Wednesday, shortly before he pleaded no contest to a felony perjury charge. He was the first district attorney in decades to face removal from office in a proceeding initiated by a civil grand jury. In recent years, a number of elected prosecutors have found themselves under serious professional scrutiny.
June 15, 2017 at 02:48 PM
8 minute read
Contra Costa County District Attorney Mark Peterson resigned from office Wednesday, shortly before he pleaded no contest to a felony perjury charge. He was sentenced to 250 hours of community service and probation.
The abrupt end to Peterson's 33-year career as a Contra Costa prosecutor, the last seven of which he served as the county's elected district attorney, stems from his use of more than $66,000 in campaign money between 2011 and 2015 on personal items, including movie tickets, clothes and gasoline.
Peterson's attorney, Ted Cassman of Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, declined to comment Thursday.
Peterson has said he mistakenly considered the withdrawals a loan. He eventually repaid all of the money to his campaign, including half of it after he learned the account would be audited by the Franchise Tax Board. But Peterson never recorded the withdrawals or expenditures on his state-mandated campaign finance statements, documents that he signed, under penalty of perjury, as accurate.
The California Fair Political Practices Commission in January fined Peterson $45,000.
“When an official makes personal use of campaign funds, it erodes public confidence in the political process by blurring that line between lawful contributions and payments to public officials,” commission staff wrote in a memo recommending the fine.
A civil grand jury recommended in May that Peterson be removed from office. Later that month, the Attorney General's Office took the case for investigation. On Wednesday, state prosecutors filed 12 felony counts of perjury and one count of felony grand theft.
Peterson's tenure as district attorney had been tumultuous since his first election in 2010, which followed a nasty campaign against another long-time prosecutor in the office. Some deputy district attorneys alleged that Peterson retaliated against them for supporting his opponent, claims that he denied.
By 2012, three lawsuits had been brought by current and former Contra Costa County prosecutors against their employer. One claimed workplace racism. Another former deputy sued for malicious prosecution after he was charged with the rape of a co-worker, charges that were later thrown out by a judge. A third deputy filed a personal injury suit stemming from an alleged office fistfight.
Peterson was the first district attorney in decades to face removal from office in a proceeding initiated by a civil grand jury. In recent years, however, a number of elected prosecutors have found themselves under serious professional scrutiny.
â–º Former Del Norte County District Attorney Jon Alexander was disbarred in 2014 for misconduct in office, including talking to a represented defendant facing felony charges brought by his office.
Alexander was a former methamphetamine addict who derailed a promising Southern California law practice but later resurrected his career by getting clean and winning the 2010 district attorney election in Del Norte on a “death to meth” campaign. Alexander denied the charges and said he was targeted because of his former drug use.
â–º In February, the California State Bar filed disciplinary charges against former Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich for allegedly suppressing evidence and allowing false testimony in a death-penalty case he tried as an assistant district attorney in 1986. A federal judge last year overturned the conviction in that case, citing prosecutorial misconduct. Trutanich has denied all the bar's charges.
â–º For almost two years after his re-election defeat in 2014, former Riverside County District Attorney Paul Zellerbach faced legal questions over his office's participation in a massive wiretapping program that USA Today found was one of the largest in the nation. In October 2016, a Riverside County judge upheld the legality of the eavesdropping.
Zellerbach also ran into trouble stemming from his 2014 re-election campaign. In January 2015 he pleaded guilty to a charge of misdemeanor vandalism for damaging one of his opponent's campaign signs. Zellerbach also received a public reproval and one year of professional probation from the State Bar for his sign attack.
Contra Costa County District Attorney Mark Peterson resigned from office Wednesday, shortly before he pleaded no contest to a felony perjury charge. He was sentenced to 250 hours of community service and probation.
The abrupt end to Peterson's 33-year career as a Contra Costa prosecutor, the last seven of which he served as the county's elected district attorney, stems from his use of more than $66,000 in campaign money between 2011 and 2015 on personal items, including movie tickets, clothes and gasoline.
Peterson's attorney, Ted Cassman of Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, declined to comment Thursday.
Peterson has said he mistakenly considered the withdrawals a loan. He eventually repaid all of the money to his campaign, including half of it after he learned the account would be audited by the Franchise Tax Board. But Peterson never recorded the withdrawals or expenditures on his state-mandated campaign finance statements, documents that he signed, under penalty of perjury, as accurate.
The California Fair Political Practices Commission in January fined Peterson $45,000.
“When an official makes personal use of campaign funds, it erodes public confidence in the political process by blurring that line between lawful contributions and payments to public officials,” commission staff wrote in a memo recommending the fine.
A civil grand jury recommended in May that Peterson be removed from office. Later that month, the Attorney General's Office took the case for investigation. On Wednesday, state prosecutors filed 12 felony counts of perjury and one count of felony grand theft.
Peterson's tenure as district attorney had been tumultuous since his first election in 2010, which followed a nasty campaign against another long-time prosecutor in the office. Some deputy district attorneys alleged that Peterson retaliated against them for supporting his opponent, claims that he denied.
By 2012, three lawsuits had been brought by current and former Contra Costa County prosecutors against their employer. One claimed workplace racism. Another former deputy sued for malicious prosecution after he was charged with the rape of a co-worker, charges that were later thrown out by a judge. A third deputy filed a personal injury suit stemming from an alleged office fistfight.
Peterson was the first district attorney in decades to face removal from office in a proceeding initiated by a civil grand jury. In recent years, however, a number of elected prosecutors have found themselves under serious professional scrutiny.
â–º Former Del Norte County District Attorney Jon Alexander was disbarred in 2014 for misconduct in office, including talking to a represented defendant facing felony charges brought by his office.
Alexander was a former methamphetamine addict who derailed a promising Southern California law practice but later resurrected his career by getting clean and winning the 2010 district attorney election in Del Norte on a “death to meth” campaign. Alexander denied the charges and said he was targeted because of his former drug use.
â–º In February, the California State Bar filed disciplinary charges against former Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich for allegedly suppressing evidence and allowing false testimony in a death-penalty case he tried as an assistant district attorney in 1986. A federal judge last year overturned the conviction in that case, citing prosecutorial misconduct. Trutanich has denied all the bar's charges.
â–º For almost two years after his re-election defeat in 2014, former Riverside County District Attorney Paul Zellerbach faced legal questions over his office's participation in a massive wiretapping program that USA Today found was one of the largest in the nation. In October 2016, a Riverside County judge upheld the legality of the eavesdropping.
Zellerbach also ran into trouble stemming from his 2014 re-election campaign. In January 2015 he pleaded guilty to a charge of misdemeanor vandalism for damaging one of his opponent's campaign signs. Zellerbach also received a public reproval and one year of professional probation from the State Bar for his sign attack.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look at Big Law Partner Donors to Trump and Harris in California
Big Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readRussia-Linked Deepfakes Are Hitting the US Election. Will It Spur Congress to Act?
Trending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250