Cal.Sup.Ct.;
S225589
The California Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment and remanded. The court held that the legality of a surcharge added to utility bills and remitted to the local municipality depended on the reasonable relationship between the amount charged and the reasonable value of the property interest for which the municipality sought compensation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
