Cinema West, LLC v. Baker
C.A. 1st; A144265 The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a movie theater project that was funded, in part, with municipal…
July 03, 2017 at 06:07 PM
3 minute read
C.A. 1st;
A144265
The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a movie theater project that was funded, in part, with municipal funds, was a “public work” within the meaning of the prevailing wage law.
In 2004, the City of Hesperia began acquiring vacant property in its downtown to facilitate development of a Civic Plaza, which was to include a city hall, public library, other government buildings and “complimentary retail, restaurant, and entertainment establishments.” The city's goal was “to develop a vibrant, participatory multi- and mixed-use civic/downtown environment.” Hesperia did not have a movie theater. From 2000 to 2010, the city met with numerous theater operators in an effort to facilitate construction of a “state-of-the-art cinema experience in Hesperia.” For predominantly financial reasons, no company had built a theater during that period. In 2010, the city met with appellant Cinema West, LLC (Cinema West), who “articulated a cogent plan to develop a new, 12-screen digital cinema immediately west of the Civic Plaza Park.” Cinema West's proposal included the following “deal points”: the city would convey about 54,000 square feet of real property to Cinema West for $102,529, the property's fair market value; Cinema West would construct a “38,000 square foot, twelve-screen digital theater”; the city would construct “the necessary parking lot and provide reciprocal access and use of said parking lot,” develop a water retention system for the theater and the parking lot, and install “off-site improvements including curb, gutter and sidewalks”; Cinema West would execute a ten-year operating agreement with the city. The anticipated cost to the city was over $1.4 million. The city approved the agreement, and Cinema West began construction of the theater.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalif. Teachers Retirement Fund, Repped by Pillsbury, Sues Construction Company, Alleging Contracting Fraud
Honeywell Hit With Negligence Suit for Allegedly Failing to Recall Malfunctioning Fire Sprinkler Devices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250