Facebook, Shutting Down Pot Pages, Still Won't Like Marijuana
Facebook Inc. has taken down the pages of marijuana businesses operating legally in Alaska, continuing a practice that has targeted dispensaries in California, Arizona, Colorado and New Jersey.
July 11, 2017 at 07:08 PM
3 minute read
Facebook Inc. has taken down the pages of marijuana businesses operating legally in Alaska, continuing a practice that has targeted dispensaries in California, Arizona, Colorado and New Jersey.
The pages of at least six Alaska marijuana retailers were blocked in early July, about the same time Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was visiting the state for the Fourth of July holiday, according to the Alaska Dispatch News.
Alaska in 2015 became the third state to legalize recreational marijuana. Marijuana business owners, who face restrictions on traditional advertising, said they turned to Facebook to connect with customers given the lack of other options.
Facebook's user policy bars content that promotes marijuana sales, even in states where it's legal. The social media giant does allow marijuana advocacy pages, so long as they don't promote sales.
A quick scan of Facebook Tuesday revealed pages operated by dispensaries in California, where medical marijuana use is legal, and in Nevada, which just launched commercial operations on July 1.
“Anyone can report content to us if they think it violates our standards,” Facebook spokeswoman Ruchika Budhraja said in an email. “Our teams review these reports rapidly and will remove the content if there is a violation.”
California, Facebook's home state, will begin licensing commercial recreational marijuana businesses in January. Budhraja did not respond to a question about what the site will do should the hundreds—perhaps thousands—of licensees seek to maintain or launch pages. California would be the largest state to adopt recreational marijuana regulations.
Taylor West, deputy director of the National Cannabis Industry Association, said members of her organization talked to Facebook leaders about the page takedowns when they happened in Colorado about two years ago.
“We asked if they could please provide some clear rules about what does and does not violate their community standards,” West said. “We told them, 'You'll never find businesses that are more eager to follow rules.'”
Facebook at first “made all the right noises,” West said, but clearer guidelines never materialized. “It sort of leaves everybody up in the air,” she said.
Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law who runs the Technology & Marketing Law Blog, said Facebook's actions are “completely logical” given that marijuana remains illegal under federal law.
“Publishing ads for an illegal item might expose Facebook to liability,” Goldman said. As a freedom of speech issue, “Facebook is the publisher and they can decide what to publish.”
Related Articles:
|- 6 Ways California Can Entice Banks to Serve Marijuana Clients
- How High Is Too High? Crunching Marijuana Taxes
- A Denver Credit Union Won't Retreat in Marijuana Banking Fight
- California Judges Are Told to Stay Away from Pot Businesses
- Becerra Says Sessions Should 'Worry About His Own Problems,' Not Marijuana
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All9th Circuit Drills Down on Venue Issue in Privacy Suit Against E-Commerce Platform
Appeals Court Upholds Ruling That an Online Archive's Book Sharing Violated Copyright Law
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250