Facebook, Shutting Down Pot Pages, Still Won't Like Marijuana
Facebook Inc. has taken down the pages of marijuana businesses operating legally in Alaska, continuing a practice that has targeted dispensaries in California, Arizona, Colorado and New Jersey.
July 11, 2017 at 07:08 PM
3 minute read
Facebook Inc. has taken down the pages of marijuana businesses operating legally in Alaska, continuing a practice that has targeted dispensaries in California, Arizona, Colorado and New Jersey.
The pages of at least six Alaska marijuana retailers were blocked in early July, about the same time Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was visiting the state for the Fourth of July holiday, according to the Alaska Dispatch News.
Alaska in 2015 became the third state to legalize recreational marijuana. Marijuana business owners, who face restrictions on traditional advertising, said they turned to Facebook to connect with customers given the lack of other options.
Facebook's user policy bars content that promotes marijuana sales, even in states where it's legal. The social media giant does allow marijuana advocacy pages, so long as they don't promote sales.
A quick scan of Facebook Tuesday revealed pages operated by dispensaries in California, where medical marijuana use is legal, and in Nevada, which just launched commercial operations on July 1.
“Anyone can report content to us if they think it violates our standards,” Facebook spokeswoman Ruchika Budhraja said in an email. “Our teams review these reports rapidly and will remove the content if there is a violation.”
California, Facebook's home state, will begin licensing commercial recreational marijuana businesses in January. Budhraja did not respond to a question about what the site will do should the hundreds—perhaps thousands—of licensees seek to maintain or launch pages. California would be the largest state to adopt recreational marijuana regulations.
Taylor West, deputy director of the National Cannabis Industry Association, said members of her organization talked to Facebook leaders about the page takedowns when they happened in Colorado about two years ago.
“We asked if they could please provide some clear rules about what does and does not violate their community standards,” West said. “We told them, 'You'll never find businesses that are more eager to follow rules.'”
Facebook at first “made all the right noises,” West said, but clearer guidelines never materialized. “It sort of leaves everybody up in the air,” she said.
Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law who runs the Technology & Marketing Law Blog, said Facebook's actions are “completely logical” given that marijuana remains illegal under federal law.
“Publishing ads for an illegal item might expose Facebook to liability,” Goldman said. As a freedom of speech issue, “Facebook is the publisher and they can decide what to publish.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All9th Circuit Drills Down on Venue Issue in Privacy Suit Against E-Commerce Platform
Appeals Court Upholds Ruling That an Online Archive's Book Sharing Violated Copyright Law
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250