C.A. 1st;
A147740

The First Appellate District affirmed in part a judgment and remanded. The court held that because the crime of felony identity theft involves specific conduct above and beyond that addressed in the misdemeanor statutes pertaining to false representation of identity to a peace officer, the Williamson rule did not apply to preclude the defendant’s prosecution for the greater offense.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]