Reed v. Lieurance
9th Cir.; 15-35018 The court of appeals reversed in part a judgment and remanded. The court held that evidence supported the plaintiff’s claim…
July 24, 2017 at 06:30 PM
3 minute read
9th Cir.;
15-35018
The court of appeals reversed in part a judgment and remanded. The court held that evidence supported the plaintiff's claim that a deputy's alleged basis for citing him for obstruction during his attempted observation of buffalo herding was pretextual.
Anthony Reed was a volunteer with the Buffalo Field Campaign, a non-profit conservation organization that sends volunteers to observe and document the herding of buffalo in and near Yellowstone National Park. On May 23, 2012, Reed and another volunteer were in a vehicle attempting to observe the herding of buffalo east into Yellowstone National Park across Highway 191. Agent Rob Tierney of the Montana Department of Livestock was in charge of the haze that day, and Gallatin County Sheriff's Deputy Doug Lieurance was assigned to provide assistance. Upon encountering Reed's vehicle parked near Highway 191, Tierney advised him that he was in the planned herding route and needed to move. Reed drove about 0.6 miles north and parked on a gravel road running parallel to the highway. Based on his prior experience, Reed believed this location put him well out of the way, while still affording a view of the herding. Deputy Lieurance followed Reed to his new location, complained that he had not relocated as he was told to do, and cited him for obstructing a peace officer. Lieurance also told Reed that he would be arrested if he did not move to a location where he would no longer be able to observe the herding. Reed complied. The court later dismissed the citation issued by Lieurance. Reed sued Lieurance, the sheriff's office, and the county for violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights and for failure to train the county's officers regarding the obstruction statute and the First and Fourth Amendments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS to pay nearly $116M to settle lawsuits over rampant sexual abuse at California women's prison
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute read'We Are Prepared to Fight': Governor Calls Special Session to Fund Legal Attacks on Trump Policies
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250